Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

MISSION VILLA SENIOR LIVINGLicense 4156010461 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Regarding the allegation, staff did not dispense medication to a resident as prescribed, according to the reporting party, when R1 arrived at the facility on 10/17/24, staff did not dispense R1’s evening medications or morning medications the next day. During the investigation, LPA reviewed documents provided by the facility and interviewed the administrator. The administrator denied the allegation and indicated that R1’s family did not provide medications to the facility when R1 moved in and the facility had to order the medications through the pharmacy, however the pharmacy was unable to deliver all the medications timely. Based on the QMAR reviewed, the facility noted that some of the medications were not available at the facility, however the ones that the pharmacy delivered were provided to R1. In addition, based on R1's care notes, it was noted that the facility called the pharmacy on 10/17/24 to re-order all of R1's medications, however the pharmacy was only able to deliver some of the R1's medications on 10/18/24 in the morning. Regarding the allegation, Licensee did not ensure resident’s bathroom was in good repair, according to the reporting party, R1’s toilet tank was missing completely. During the investigation, LPA observed the toilet tank in good repair and fixed in the room R1 used to stay in. LPA reviewed a receipt from the administrator that indicated, on 10/24/24 a new toilet was purchased and replaced on the same day. LPA confirmed with the Maintenance Director that the toilet was fixed the same day it was bought. Regarding the allegation, staff did not ensure resident was provided with adequate bed linens, according to the reporting party, R1’s family provided sheets to R1 but during a visit on 10/26/24, it was observed that R1 did not have any linens and staff indicated that the linens were being washed. During the investigation, LPA interviewed administrator and staff and observed 5 resident rooms. LPA observed all rooms to have bed linens. Based on interviews with housekeeping staff, it was indicated that bed linens are provided by family and staff wash them once a week or as needed. Regarding the allegation, staff did not ensure resident was provided postural supports, according to the reporting party, R1 was noted to be a fall risk, however the facility did not provide any equipment to prevents falls such as grip bars or slip-resistant mats. (Continue to 9099C) During the investigation, LPA reviewed R1's file and interviewed the administrator. Based on R1's physician's report, R1 is noted to be non-ambulatory and the service plan indicates R1 will ambulate independently throughout the community. Based on administrator interviews, R1 was not at fall risk and the facility is not a medical facility where postural supports are provided by the facility. According to interviewed staff, the facility does have non-skid mats that staff will put in residents showers before giving residents a shower. Based on observations, documents reviewed, and interviews conducted, the department has determined that although the above allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Report is reviewed with the administrator and a copy is provided.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.652(c)Type A

    1569.652 Termination of admission agreement upon death of resident; removal of resident’s property; refund of fees paid; notice of contract termination and refunds : (c) A refund of any fees paid in advance covering the time after the resident’s personal property has been removed from the facility shall be issued to the individual...responsible for the fees ...within 15 days after the personal property is removed.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on the admission agreement reviewed and the copy of check provided for review, R1 moved out of the facility on 11/2/24 and all personal belongings were removed, however facility did not issue a refund check until 12/17/24.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 24, 2025 inspection of MISSION VILLA SENIOR LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of MISSION VILLA SENIOR LIVING on February 24, 2025. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to MISSION VILLA SENIOR LIVING on February 24, 2025?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (1 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "1569.652 Termination of admission agreement upon death of resident; removal of resident’s property; refund of fees paid;..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.