Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Incident investigation

A & J ASSISTED LIVING FACILITYLicense 4156010662 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On November 12, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced case- management visit in relation to an incident that occurred on 9/24/25. LPA met with Assistant Administrator, Gabriel Mendoza and explained the purpose of the visit. The Licensee reported on September 24, 2025 at around 7:00pm, the police officers arrived to the facility with Resident 1 (R1). Licensee indicated R1 was found a block away from the facility and staff are unaware how R1 was able to leave unseen. When staff made rounds at 6:30pm, R1 was observed in his/her room. During the visit today, LPA interviewed assistant administrator, reviewed R1's file, and toured the facility to check the exit door alarms. LPA checked 5 exit doors on the first floor; of which 2 did not have alarms (including front door), 2 were off but working, 1 was working, and 1 that requires replacement. The exit door on the ramp was observed working but turned off. LPA checked 4 exit doors on the second floor, of which 3 were observed working, 1 observed not to have an alarm at all. Based on R1's physician report reviewed dated 12/21/24, R1 has dementia, is confused, disoriented, and unable to leave the facility unassisted. Although R1's physician's report indicated R1 does not have a wandering behavior, based on R1's reappraisal dated, 12/5/25, the facility noted R1 to be a wanderer and is confused and forgetful. According to the assistant administrator and the staff schedule reviewed from September 24, 2025, there were 3 caregivers on the first floor, 2 caregivers on the second floor and 1 med-tech throughout the entire facility during PM shift on 9/24/25. The assistant administrator indicated the staff did not see R1 elope from the facility. According to the assistant administrator and observations, the front entrance door does not have any locks or alarms and is unlocked 24/7. (continue to 809C). The Licensee failed to provide care and supervision as necessary to meet the needs of R1 after noting on R1's reappraisal that R1 is a wanderer, has confusion and forgetfulness which resulted into R1 leaving the facility unassisted without staff being aware. Deficiency was observed during the visit and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and Health and Safety Code. See LIC809-D. A Civil penalty of $1,000.00 is assessed for a repeat violation within the last 12 months for CCR 87464(f)(1). Report is reviewed with the assistant administrator and a copy is provided with appeal rights. A copy of the civil penalty is also provided with appeal rights.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • Care and supervision as defined by statute and rules

    87464 Basic Services: (f) Basic services shall at a minimum include: (1) Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Code section 1569.2(c).This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on R1’s file reviewed, R1 has dementia, is unable to leave the facility unassisted and is a wanderer, however on 9/24/25, R1 eloped from the facility and was brought back to the facility by police officers at around 7pm. According to the assistant administrator, the staff on the second floor did not see R1 leave the facility and are not sure how R1 left the facility which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87705(d)Type A

    Auditory exit monitoring for elopement risk

    87705 Care of Persons with Dementia: (d) The licensee shall ensure that the facility has an auditory device or other staff alert feature to monitor exits on exterior doors...accessible to those residents who may be at risk for elopement...This requirement is not met as evidenced by Based on observations, LPA observed 11 exit doors thoughout the facility; of which 3 doors did not have alarms, 3 doors with working alarms but were turned off, and 1 that was not working at all. According to R1's file, R1 has dementia, is a wanderer and is unable to leave the facility unassisted, however the Licensee failed to ensure the door alarms were in good working condition which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the November 12, 2025 inspection of A & J ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY?

This was an other inspection of A & J ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY on November 12, 2025. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to A & J ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY on November 12, 2025?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (2 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "87464 Basic Services: (f) Basic services shall at a minimum include: (1) Care and supervision as defined in Section 8710..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was an other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.