Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

COGIR OF BELMONTLicense 4156010801 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Furthermore, according to Staff 1 (S1), he/she had an interaction with the reporting party when the reporting party came to the facility to visit to current residents. S1 indicated he/she notified Staff 2 (S2) to let the residents know that the reporting party was at the facility to visit them, however according to S2, he/she indicated that he/she was never told to go check on the residents to see if they wanted the reporting party to visit. Nevertheless, the facility denied resident rights to visitors. Based on interviews conducted and information collected during the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, this allegation is determined to be substantiated. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC9099-D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Report was discussed with Administrator, and Appeal Rights provided.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • Private visitor access without prior notice

    87468.2 Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities: (a) In addition to the rights listed in Section 87468.1, Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities, residents in privately operated residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (11) To have their visitors...permitted to visit privately during reasonable hours and without prior notice, provided that the rights of other residents are not infringed upon. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: According to the interviews conducted, it does not seem like facility has a fixed policy in place for visitation as interviews conducted indicates that the policy is determined by individual receptionists. In addition, based on staff interviews, when R1 came to visit two residents at the facility, S1 indicated he/she notified S2 to let the residents know that the reporting party was at the facility to visit them, however according to S2, he/she indicated that he/she was never told to go check on the residents to see if they wanted the reporting party to visit.

    Read full inspector narrative
  • 87309(a)Type B

    Ensure hazardous items are locked and not unattended

    Based on observations, LPA observed a housekeeping cart on the second floor and a housekeeping cart on the third floor to be unlocked with chemicals in them which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 23, 2026 inspection of COGIR OF BELMONT?

This was a complaint inspection of COGIR OF BELMONT on April 23, 2026. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to COGIR OF BELMONT on April 23, 2026?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "87468.2 Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities: (a) In addition to the rights listed i..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.