Skip to main content
ReadyRule homepageReadyRule

Inspection visit

Follow-up

BURLINGAME SENIOR LIVINGLicense 415601126
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On 1/15/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conduced an unannounced Case Management visit to follow - up on an Unlawful Detainer order. LPA met with the administrator and explained the purpose of today's visit. Facility was granted an unlawful detainer order for residents #1 (R1) due to non-payment and according to the order, R1 was supposed to be discharged today. Upon entrance, LPA observed the administrator, 3 sheriffs, 2 Ombudsman, representative from the placement agency and a administrator and a resident service coordinator from another facility assisting R1 with discharge planning. After a few hours of working with R1, the administrator reported that the sheriffs did not remove R1 from the facility as R1 refused to leave and go to a destination that was arranged by the facility. Therefore, R1 will be staying for 5 more days while the placement agency is seeking for a safe discharge destination. No deficiency cite today. This report is reviewed and discussed with the administrator. A copy is provided.

Citations

4 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.625(b)(2)Type A

    Based on [(observation) (interview) (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as 3 out of 5 staff did not have training records indicating that their required annual training was completed in 2024 which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87355(e)(4)Type A

    Request transfer of criminal record exemption

    Based on [(observation) (interview) (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as 1 out of 5 staff was not associated with this facility which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87355(j)Type B

    Based on [(observation) (interview) (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as 4 out of 5 staff did not have the criminal record clearances in their personnel files which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87411(f)Type A

    Health screening and fitness requirements

    Based on [(observation) (interview) (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as 2 out of 5 staff files did not have a copy of their TB and Health Screen results which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 15, 2025 inspection of BURLINGAME SENIOR LIVING?

This was an other inspection of BURLINGAME SENIOR LIVING on January 15, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to BURLINGAME SENIOR LIVING on January 15, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was an other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.