Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On March 5, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced 10-day complaint visit. LPA met with Resident Services Director, Anne Dasmarinas and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, staff do not provide adequate food service, according to the reporting party, the med-tech requested assistance from the caregiver to check on Resident 1 (R1) who had not eaten his/her breakfast, however the caregiver stated that R1 did not want to get up. According to the reporting party, the med-tech had to go to R1’s room to assess R1 and bring him/her down to the dining room. Furthermore, reporting party stated, R1 was hungry and wanted to go to the dining room. During the investigation, LPA interviewed R1, staff and reviewed R1's service plan. Based on R1's service plan, R1 is independent for meals and food trays are delivered to his/her room for every meal. According to staff interviewed, R1 eats meals in his/her room because he/she likes to be in his/her room. LPA interviewed R1 who indicated he/she received his/her meal this morning and has not had an issue with meal service. Based on documents reviewed and interviews conducted, the department has determined that although the above allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the above allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87224(f)Type B

    Eviction report must be filed within five days

    87224 Eviction Procedures: (f) A written report of any eviction shall be sent to the licensing agency within five (5) days.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, the facility was unable to provide LPA documentation to show that a copy of the 30-day eviction for R1 was submitted to CCLD. In addition, based on CCLD's record, a copy of the eviction notice was not observed which poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 5, 2026 inspection of SERRA HIGHLANDS SENIOR LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of SERRA HIGHLANDS SENIOR LIVING on March 5, 2026. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to SERRA HIGHLANDS SENIOR LIVING on March 5, 2026?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.