Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

MARAVILLALicense 4258019371 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Interviews determined the staff who mixed up R1 and R2 was from a caregiver agency. Staff interviewed stated sometimes agency staff are not reminded to look in resident binders to confirm who the resident is. LPA reviewed residents’ Service Plan, which stated Resident 1 (R1) requires two-person total assistance for transferring, dressing, and toileting. Staff interviewed stated the agency staff failed to follow policy by disregarding the transferring policy of R1. Agency staff toileted, dressed and transferred R1 without assistance and resulted in R1 being returned to wrong room and bed. Staff stated the agency staff worked on their own and did not collaborate with the other facility staff, and had a bad attitude about the incident. Following the incident, facility management decided this agency staff would not work in memory care and later not in the facility at all. Neither staff nor Administrator denied that the incident took place. Based on the information obtained, the allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. Exit interview, deficiencies cited 9099-D, report given, appeal rights given. Documents provided indicated in January 2024, the facility had 16 residents in the memory care, 8 of which required two-person assist. During January 2024, scheduled indicated there were two caregivers and one med tech. Effective February 2024, three caregivers and one med tech were assigned. Although, the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Technical Assistance is issued to remind the facility they should adjust their staffing ratio appropriately based on resident’s needs. Exit interview conducted, copy of report issued.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • Right to sufficient care and qualified staff

    Additional Personal Rights of Residents...(a)Residents shall have rights...(4) To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in competency to meet their needs. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, the licensee did not comply with this section when staff lacked competency in mixing up R1 & R2, which posed a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the June 7, 2024 inspection of MARAVILLA?

This was a complaint inspection of MARAVILLA on June 7, 2024. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to MARAVILLA on June 7, 2024?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "Additional Personal Rights of Residents...(a)Residents shall have rights...(4) To care, supervision, and services that ..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.