Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

WESTMONT OF SANTA BARBARALicense 425802106
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Hospice notes on 6/5/22 indicated a Temporary Travel Hospice Nurse (H1) went to visit R1 for a Fentanyl patch change and refill, notes indicated R1 did not have a Fentanyl patch on, a caregiver helped assess R1 and both were unable to locate the patch. The nurse placed a new patch on R1’s right upper arm and notified Facility Director. 6/5/22 Resident 2 (R2) Hospice notes state R2 does not have a fentanyl patch on, H1 assessed R2’s skin with caregiver help and both were unable to locate the Fentanyl patch. H1 placed new patch with Tegaderm on upper right arm. H1 informed the Resident Services Director about the missing patch. On 6/2/22 a Fentanyl patch was applied to R2’s left upper arm. The Hospice Manager stated there was not note of a Tegaderm being applied and explained to LPA that Tegaderm is an extra sticky protector usually placed on top of IVs. Hospice notes for Resident 3 (R3) from 5/29/22 indicate that the Fentanyl patch was not found on R3, a new patch was applied and Resident Services Director was notified. LPA interviewed Resident Services Director who stated they were aware of R2 and R3 missing a patch but not R1. The Resident Services Director called the primary Hospice Nurse (H2) regarding the missing patches the following day who said that patches fall off all the time, and to not worry about it. LPA interviewed Hospice Nurse (H2) who stated that their patient R3 has lost their Fentanyl patch twice but it had always been found. On 6/1/22 during the visit with R3 the missing patch was found on R3’s arm and two patches were present. The other time it was lost a few months ago H2 found it in the laundry. H2 explained that they have been working at the facility as a Hospice Nurse for over 3 years and believes there is no dispersion whatsoever. H2 explained that fentanyl patches fall off “all the time”, they are sticky and will stick to sheets and blankets which end up in the laundry. LPA Olson interviewed a medtech who stated that they present with the Hospice Nurse (H1) during a visit with R3. The medtech witnessed no patch on R3 and states that they looked everywhere for it. The medtech could not recall what date this occurred but remembers the Hospice Nurse stating that it might have fallen off so they applied a Tegaderm on top of the Fentanyl patch to protect it. LPA Olson was not able to interview Resident 1 because they had passed away on 7/21/22. Resident 2 was unable to be interviewed because they were non verbal. LPA interviewed Resident 3 who stated that their pain was managed well. R3 was not sure if they had fentanyl patches but they do remember something being on their arm. R3 does not remember if it ever fell off. LPA requested R3s MAR which shows R3 Fentanyl patch was discontinued on 6/8/22. Based on interviews and record review the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Report issued via email to Administrator.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87303(a)Type B

    87303(a) Maintenance and Operation: The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors.This requirement was not as evidenced by: Based on interviews, the licensee failed to ensure that R1’s door was functioning, which posed a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.

  • 87355(1)(2)Type A

    This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as eight (8) facility staff were not associated to work in the facility and one (1) facility staff did not receive a fingerprint clearance and/or background check prior to working in the facility which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 4, 2022 inspection of WESTMONT OF SANTA BARBARA?

This was a complaint inspection of WESTMONT OF SANTA BARBARA on August 4, 2022. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to WESTMONT OF SANTA BARBARA on August 4, 2022?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.