Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

SANTA BARBARA MEMORY CARELicense 4258021162 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

LPA also requested copies of documents pertaining to the investigation. On 03/02/2022, from 2:00pm to 4:20pm, (LPA) Kontilis conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility and met with Miriam Santiago, Interim Administrator and Business Office Manager. LPA obtained documents pertaining to the above-stated allegations and conducted interviews from 2:00pm to 4:10pm. LPA Kontilis conducted interviews with the complainant on 05/01/2020 and 05/05/2020; with staff on 05/04/2020 at approximately 4:55pm, on 03/02/2022 at approximately 11:36am to 2:10pm, and on 03/04/2022 at approximately 11:19am. On 04/15/2020, Resident #1 (R1) was admitted to the facility. R1’s Physician Report, signed 04/14/2020 by Dr. Winner, listed the diagnosis as AFib, HTN, hyperlipidemia, anxiety and dementia. Additional conditions included aggressive, inappropriate, wandering, sundowning behaviors, confused and disoriented. R1’s ability to communicate needs and feed self was listed as borderline. On the allegation: Resident assaulted other resident(s) in care. On 04/25/2020, at approximately 9:45am, R1 became aggressive and began flipping over tables, chairs and planted pots in the dining room and courtyard. Staff and residents were present during the incident and reported being pushed or hit by R1’s actions. Staff called 911, and Santa Barbara City Police arrived and assessed R1. R1 exhibited increased agitation and police subdued resident handcuffed on the ground. Once R1 was calm, the med tech was able to provide R1 their prescribed PRN for anxiety. On 04/26/2020, at approximately 6:30am, R1 approached staff and requested a shower. Staff escorted R1 to the shower when R1 pushed staff. Staff moved away from R1 to give space, R1’s agitation increased and began banging on the med room window. R1 then went to the outdoor courtyard and attempted to jump over the gate. Staff was able to redirect resident back inside. Staff called 911, and Santa Barbara City Police arrived and assessed R1. On both dates, police stated they were unable to take R1 via 5150 and the facility was instructed to call the crisis hotline prior to calling 911 for 5150 situations. On 04/27/2020, the Executive Director contacted R1’s physician to request a medication evaluation for R1 and the PRN medication order was changed to routine. Staff received an in-service training regarding the protocol for future incidents and were instructed to call crisis hotline to request paramedics instead of police officers so that the mobile crisis unit could intervene. A review of the April 2020 staff schedule and statements from management and staff interviews revealed that at the time R1 was admitted to the facility on 04/15/2020, there was not an adequate amount of staff to provide the proper care and supervision to R1. Based on the information obtained, the allegation is deemed substantiated at this time. On the allegation: Facility is not adequately staffed to meet residents’ needs. A review of the April 2020 resident roster found that there were thirteen (13) residents, of which six (6) were on hospice. All residents had a diagnosis of dementia. Five (5) residents required a two (2) person assist, two (2) residents required a Hoyer lift for transfers, eight (8) residents required a one (1 ) person assist with activities of daily living, and four (4) residents required feeding assistance. The staff schedule for April 2020 reflected there was one (1) caregiver and one (1) med tech on the a.m. shift and the p.m. shift, and two (2) caregivers on the overnight shift. Information obtained through interviews found that the caregivers also had to perform housekeeping and laundry duties. Management and staff interviews revealed that there was not an adequate amount of staff and that the staffing budget had been cut by corporate due to the low amount of admissions to the facility. Interviews also revealed that at times there were no staff present with the residents in the dining and common areas due to staff were attending to other residents in their rooms. Based on the information obtained, the allegation is deemed substantiated at this time. Pursuant to Title 22, California Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies are cited (refer to LIC 9099-D). Exit interview conducted, appeal rights discussed, and a copy of this report issued. LPA also requested copies of documents pertaining to the investigation. On 03/02/2022, from 2:00pm to 4:20pm, (LPA) Kontilis conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility and met with Miriam Santiago, Interim Administrator and Business Office Manager. LPA obtained documents pertaining to the above-stated allegations and conducted interviews from 2:00pm to 4:10pm. LPA Kontilis conducted interviews with the complainant on 05/01/2020 and 05/05/2020; with staff on 05/04/2020 at approximately 4:55pm, on 03/02/2022 at approximately 11:36am to 2:10pm, and on 03/04/2022 at approximately 11:19am. On 04/15/2020, Resident #1 (R1) was admitted to the facility. R1’s Physician Report, signed 04/14/2020 by Dr. Winner, listed the diagnosis as AFib, HTN, hyperlipidemia, anxiety and dementia. Additional conditions included aggressive, inappropriate, wandering, sundowning behaviors, confused and disoriented. R1’s ability to communicate needs and feed self was listed as borderline. On the allegation: Staff not following resident admission procedures. Copies of admission paperwork for R1 were obtained and reviewed. R1’s Resident Assessment is dated 04/14/2020; the following forms were dated 4/15/2020 and signed by R1’s representative and Mary Moore, Executive Director: Pre-Placement Appraisal; Financial/Responsibility Form; Admission Agreement; Physician Report; tb clearance; Sansum Clinic medication list; I.D. and Emergency form; and Needs and Services Plan. Based on the information obtained, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted, appeal rights and a copy of this report issued.

Citations

4 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.312(a)Type A

    H&S 1569.312(a) Basic services requirementsEvery facility required to be licensed under this chapter shall provide at least the following basic services: (a) Care and supervision as defined in Section 1569.2This requirement is not met as evidenced by:Based on interviews and records review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. Licensee failed to provide adequate care and supervision to R1 which attributed to R1’s aggressive, assaultive incidents on 04/25/2020 and 04/26/2020,which posed an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk to person in care.

  • 87411(a)Type A

    Facility personnel sufficiency and competence

    87411 Personnel Requirements - General(a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. Licensee failed to provide adequate staffing to care for thirteen (13) dementia residents, which posed an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk to residents in care.

  • 1569.652(c)Type B

    H&S 1569.652(c) Termination of admission agreement upon death of resident...(c) A refund of any fees paid in advance covering the time after the resident’s personal property has been removed from the facility shall be issued...within 15 days after the personal property is removed.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. Licensee failed to provide R1’s Representative with a refund within 15 days after R1 passed away and personal belongings removed, which posed a potential health, safety, or personal rights to residents in care.

  • 87507(e)Type B

    Provide copies of signed agreements and amendments

    87507(e) Admission Agreements(e)The licensee shall provide a copy of the signed and dated current admission agreement... immediately upon signing the admission agreement or modification...shall provide additional copies to the resident or resident’s representative upon request. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. Licensee failed to provide R1’s Representative with a copy of R1’s Admission Agreement, which posed a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 10, 2022 inspection of SANTA BARBARA MEMORY CARE?

This was a complaint inspection of SANTA BARBARA MEMORY CARE on March 10, 2022. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to SANTA BARBARA MEMORY CARE on March 10, 2022?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (2 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "H&S 1569.312(a) Basic services requirementsEvery facility required to be licensed under this chapter shall provide at le..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.