Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

SANTA BARBARA MEMORY CARELicense 4258021162 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

During today’s visit, interviews conducted revealed that staff are sometimes unable to answer the phone because they are assisting residents with brief changes, showers, medication distribution, and other basic services. Staff 1 (S1) stated when the calls go to voicemail, the staff (caregivers, medication technicians, etc) on duty do not have access to retrieve the voicemail messages. S1 further stated when S1 takes a call and cannot provide information, the caller’s name and phone number are taken in a message book then S1 gives it to a “corporate person” when they come to the facility. During today’s visit, LPA observed the Business Office Director and the Regional Director of Operations were not available at the facility. Staff stated the Business Office Director was at the facility for approximately three hours on Monday, 1/22/2024. Staff further stated the Regional Director of Operations was at the facility for approximately one hour one day last week, possibly Tuesday, 1/16/2024 or Wednesday, 1/17/2024. Based on interviews conducted, records reviewed, and observations made, the allegation that due to lack of staffing, the facility staff are not answering the facility telephone is Substantiated at this time. On the allegation, staff did not notify authorized representative of an incident with a resident, Reporting Party (RP) stated RP learned that Resident 1 (R1) was taken to the hospital emergency room on 12/4/2023 when RP received an invoice from the medical emergency agency about three weeks after the emergency transport. During today’s visit, LPA obtained medical discharge papers and care notes indicating R1 was sent to the hospital via a call to 9-1-1. At approximately 2:34 pm, Staff 2 (S2) stated on 12/4/2023, R1 was sent to the hospital emergency room the evening of 12/4/2023. S2 further stated R1 returned from the hospital emergency room that same evening. LPA reviewed LIC624 Serious Illness/Serious Injury Reports submitted by the facility to Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) and determined that CCLD did not receive LIC624, Serious Illness/Injury Report notifying CCLD of R1’s hospital visit. At the time of the visit, no record of an incident report was available reporting R1’s emergency room visit to R1’s responsible parties or to CCLD. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the allegation that facility staff did not notify an authorized representative of an incident with a resident is Substantiated at this time. The following deficiencies were observed (see LIC 9099-D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and California Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report and appeal rights were issued at the time of the visit.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87411(a)Type A

    Facility personnel sufficiency and competence

    Type A 87411(a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs….This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, record review, and observation, the licensee did not comply in the section cited above as facility staff were unable to answer telephone calls from R1's responsible party on 8/23/2023, 8/24/2023, and 8/25/2023 which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87211(a)(d)Type A

    87211(a)(1) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require,... (1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence of any of the events specified... This requirement is not met as evidenced by:Based on record review, observation, and interviews conducted, the licensee did not comply in the section cited above as the facility staff did not notify R1's responsible party of a hospital visit; nor did the facility notify CCLD of the hospital visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 24, 2024 inspection of SANTA BARBARA MEMORY CARE?

This was a complaint inspection of SANTA BARBARA MEMORY CARE on January 24, 2024. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to SANTA BARBARA MEMORY CARE on January 24, 2024?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (2 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "Type A 87411(a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services ne..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.