Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

VILLA SANTA BARBARALicense 425850241
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Witness interviewed stated R1’s skin could have been breaking down due to their health decline. LPA reviewed R1’s physician’s report dated 2/21/2024, which states R1 had diagnoses including stage IV colorectal cancer, adrenal insufficiency, mild cognitive impairment, and hypothyroidism. The physician’s report also indicates R1 had some bladder impairment, no bowel impairment, no history of skin breakdown, is able to follow instructions and communicate needs. It also states R1 needs assistance with bathing, should have some supervision toileting but is able to care for own needs, and needs verbal prompting to dress/groom self. The physician’s report does not mention any pressure injuries or wounds. R1’s pre-admission appraisal dated 4/10/2024 states R1’s overall skin condition and skin color is “normal,” and states there are no active wounds or areas of active skin issues. The appraisal states R1 is independent with mobility, needs limited assistance with transferring, and is independent in repositioning. R1 requires minimal assistance with bathing but may require reminders, set up or standby assistance; requires minimal assistance with grooming/personal hygiene and dressing but requires verbal reminders or set up assistance; requires minimal assistance with toileting including verbal prompts and may ask for standby assistance, and states the resident is usually continent but may use adult briefs. The appraisal also states the resident has been educated on how to use their call button system for staff assistance, and R1 was coherent and able to communicate. The appraisal does not indicate R1 had any pressure injuries or wounds. LPA reviewed an internal incident report dated 4/21/2024 that R1 had a sliding fall when trying to get into a car. Staff notified R1’s doctor of the fall. LPA reviewed an internal incident report dated 4/26/2024 that indicated on 4/26/2024 R1 had an episode of vomiting, complained of back pain, and was sent to the hospital. The incident reports indicate staff were checking on R1. Interviews with staff revealed that facility caregivers checked on R1 multiple times a day and assisted R1 with activities of daily living (ADLs) as needed. R1’s discharge paperwork from the hospital dated 5/8/2024 notes diagnosis of principle pyelonephritis on 4/26/2024. The discharge paperwork does not indicate any pressure injuries, wounds or sores on R1’s skin. The discharge paperwork does state in addition to the pyelonephritis, R1 had macrocytic anemia. Interviews with administrator and wellness director revealed R1’s anemia led to increased weakness and pale skin. Wellness director, who is an RN, also stated if R1 had sores, they could have taken longer to heal due to the Anemia. Please continue to 9099-C, Pg 3. R1 was discharged from the hospital back to the facility and placed on hospice. R1’s responsible party chose to have private caregivers come in and provide additional care to R1, along with hospice. Someone on R1’s care team was present with R1 at all times from 5/8/2024 until they passed away. In addition, Administrator and Wellness Director stated facility staff also checked on R1 and checked in with R1’s private care team multiple times per day. R1’s hospice care plan dated 5/8/2024 and updated 5/11/2024 does not indicate R1 had any pressure injuries, wounds or sores. R1 passed away on hospice and was unable to be interviewed. Based on the investigation, R1 only required minimal care assistance when they moved into the facility and was able to communicate their needs to staff. R1 was not officially diagnosed with any pressure injury, sore or wound per hospital and hospice paperwork. There was insufficient evidence to prove the allegation Facility staff did not meet resident's needs. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report issued at the time of the visit.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 29, 2024 inspection of VILLA SANTA BARBARA?

This was a complaint inspection of VILLA SANTA BARBARA on May 29, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to VILLA SANTA BARBARA on May 29, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.