Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

FOUNTAIN SQUARE OF LOMPOCLicense 4258503653 citations on this visit
3 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

The complaint was referred to the Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) Investigations Branch (IB) and assigned to Investigator Philippe Ryan Miles. On 12/17/2024, from 1:00pm to 3:45pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brian Phillips conducted an unannounced initial complaint investigation visit to the facility. LPA Phillips met with Administrator Robin Murray and Community Relations Director Sarah Kau and explained the reason for the visit. During the visit, the LPA conducted in-person interviews at the facility pertaining to the complaint allegations, as well as requested and received facility documentation relevant to the investigation. The LPA determined further investigation was needed prior to issuing findings. On 12/23/2024, from approximately 1:04pm to 2:13pm, Investigator Miles and Investigator Heidy Bendana conducted interviews with Resident #1 (R1) and the resident representative for Resident #2 (R2); and on 04/13/2025, from approximately 11:54am to 2:04pm, with caregivers and med techs. The hospice residents (R2), Resident #3 (R3), and Resident #4 (R4) were not interviewed due to cognitive ability or being deceased. In addition, investigator Miles reviewed medical records from Assisted Home Health Hospice, Lompoc Valley Medical Center, Dignity Health Hospice, VNA Health Hospice, and facility file documents related to the investigation. On 5/30/2025 from approximately 10:10am to 10:50am, LPAs Haner-Tomasko and Jeffries interviewed additional staff and administrator. On the allegation: “Due to staff neglect, residents sustained injuries while under the care and supervision of the facility.” The investigation revealed that in October 2024, the facility increased the monthly rate for R2 due to the need of an “increase of the level of care and supervision,” however, R2 had an increase of witnessed and unwitnessed falls while sustaining multiple injuries. According to the Dignity Health Hospice medical records, it was noted R2 has had multiple falls. Caregivers stated R2 had multiple witnessed and unwitnessed falls, and behavioral episodes. Caregivers stated on one occasion, R2 went out a window, was found next door at Lompoc Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Center and therefore needed a higher level of care and supervision. (Continued on LIC 9099-C) According to the Assisted Home Health Hospice medical records, on 12/04/2024, the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) visited R3 and found multiple bruises to R3’s left shoulder. During assessment, R3 “had significant swelling and bruising to left shoulder that extended to left bicep and a bruise to [the] left wrist. Facility med tech states that there were no falls reported in the last 24 hours. Facility Administrator Robin Murray reports that she was going to investigate and interview all staff that helped with R3’s care within the last 24 hours to see if anyone forgot to write an incident report…”. On 12/05/2024, R3 was taken to Lompoc Valley Medical Center, and it was discovered during X-rays that R3 suffered an “impacted fracture on the humeral neck and fracture of the outer aspect of the humeral head with partial subluxation.” Caregivers interviewed stated R3 needed a higher level of care and supervision. According to VNA Health Hospice medical records, it was noted that R4 was a fall-risk with having frequent multiple falls in the facility. The caregivers stated R4, who needed a higher level of care and supervision, had witnessed and unwitnessed falls in the facility in which R4 sustained injuries. Based on the interviews conducted and supporting documents, there is sufficient evidence the facility did not provide a proper level of care and supervision to R2, R3 and R4. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. On the allegation: “Staff are not properly documenting incidents.” During the Department’s investigation it was revealed that R1 sustained 4 falls. R1 was admitted to the facility in July 2024 with falls occurring August, October, November and December 2024 , requiring medical attention; however only 1 incident report was submitted to Community Care Licensing (CCL). In addition, R4 had falls occurring February, April, and November 202 4 requiring medical attention, with no incident reports submitted. Based on the information obtained, the allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. On the allegations: “Staff left residents soiled in bed for extended periods of time and Staff are not meeting residents’ needs.” It was alleged staff left residents soiled in bed for extended periods of time, and staff were not assisting residents during bedtime, as some residents were observed in the early morning hours to still be in their wheelchairs and regular clothes. (Continued on LIC9099-C) According to the interview conducted on 12/17/2024, the Administrator stated to LPA Phillips that the facility has had a hard time retaining and hiring employees to work there due to the location as the facility is located in an isolated town comparatively in the County. The Administrator stated that during the months of October 2024 and November 2024, a number of staff (between 5-10) had left employment at the facility due to a number of reasons including financial and geographic. The staff interviewed by the LPA stated that the facility is always hiring employees to keep staffing at an appropriate level, but it is extremely difficult due to the location. Staff also stated to the LPA that there have been "a lot" of falls in the facility in the second half of 2024. The LPA was told that it was not unusual. The LPA was also told that there is a high turnover and low retention rate at the facility, but they are always trying to keep, retain, and hire staff. Multiple staff interviewed by IB investigators indicated the facility did not have enough staffing to meet residents’ needs. Staff indicated some assisted living and memory care residents required one-on-one staff, and the facility pulled facility staff from the floor to provide additional supervision, leaving the rest of the facility short-staffed. Additional interviews conducted with staff revealed there was not enough staffing to meet residents needs, residents were left soiled for extended period of time, and other needs such as assistance with dressing and bedtime routines were not met. Additionally, staff interviews revealed the facility call buttons were not functioning for a period of at least t wo weeks; this was addressed on complaint # 29-AS-20250403091059. Interviews revealed the ‘loaner’ call system was providing the incorrect room numbers. Staff also stated residents were given whistles to summon assistance, however staff could not tell which rooms the whistles were coming from, and therefore did not respond to residents. While conducting interviews with the caregivers, they disclosed that Resident #5 (R5) eloped from the facility multiple times. R5 was discovered at a staff’s house in the neighborhood and was found near the main roads in the city of Lompoc. The local police department brought him back to the facility. Incident reports submitted by the facility revealed that R5 eloped on 07/05/2024, 08/02/2024, and 10/13/2024. R2 also eloped from the facility and was found next door at the Lompoc Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Center. Based on the investigation, there is sufficient evidence to support the facility did not meet resident’s needs, including residents being left soiled for an extended period of time. Based on the information obtained, the allegations are deemed Substantiated at this time. (Continued on LIC9099-C) A $500 immediate civil penalty is assessed today. The Administrator was informed that additional civil penalties might be assessed based on Health and Safety Code 1569.49(e) and 1569.49(f). Pursuant to Title 22, California Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies are cited (refer to LIC9099-D). Exit interview conducted, appeal rights and a copy of this report issued.

Citations

5 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87218(a)(2)Type B

    87218 Theft and Loss (a) The licensee shall ensure an adequate theft and loss program...(2) A licensee who fails to make reasonable efforts to safeguard resident property,... The licensee shall be presumed to have made reasonable efforts to safeguard resident property if there is clear and convincing evidence of efforts to meet each requirement specified in Section 1569.153. This requirement was not met by evidence of lack of screening of uncleared staff and vendors, which puts residents in potential danger.

  • 87468.2(a)(25)Type B

    87468.2 Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities(a) In addition to the rights listed in Section 87468.1, Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities, residents in privately operated residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (25) To protection of their property from theft or loss according to Health and Safety Code ... This requirement was not met by evidence of several missing property items of Resident 1, which poses a potential risk to residents in care.

  • 87211(a)(1)(B)Type B

    Reporting Requirements(a) ... (1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency…within seven days of the occurrence of any of the events specified in (A) through (D) below.... (B) Any serious injury as determined by the attending physician and occurring while... the resident is under facility supervision.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. The Licensee did not submit incident reports for numerous falls for R1 and R4,...

  • 87468.2(a)(4)Type A

    Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities (a) .., residents... shall have all of the following personal rights: (4) To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers...to meet their needs. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above when they did not provide adequate staffing which resulted in residents needs not being met, including residents being left soiled for an extended period of time.

  • 87464(d)Type A

    Basic Services (d)...if a facility chooses to accept a particular resident for care, the facility shall be responsible for meeting the resident's needs as identified in the pre-admission appraisal…and providing the other basic services…either directly or through outside resources. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. Staff did not provide adequate care and supervision, residents sustaining falls resulting in injuries...

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 30, 2025 inspection of FOUNTAIN SQUARE OF LOMPOC?

This was a complaint inspection of FOUNTAIN SQUARE OF LOMPOC on May 30, 2025. 3 citations were issued: 2 Type A (serious) and 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to FOUNTAIN SQUARE OF LOMPOC on May 30, 2025?

Yes, 3 citations were issued (2 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "87218 Theft and Loss (a) The licensee shall ensure an adequate theft and loss program...(2) A licensee who fails to make..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.