Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

ROSE GARDEN COURTLicense 435200967
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On 01/14/2021, LPA interviewed the Reporting Party (RP) by phone. RP stated a complaint was filed because RP received information that S1 would not accept R1 back to the facility. RP was unable to reach out to S1 for clarification but later contacted R1’s responsible party and confirmed R1 would be accepted back to the facility after R1 was discharged from a skilled nursing facility. On 03/23/2021 , medical records reviewed noted R1 was brought to the emergency room on 3/2/21 by the facility. R1 was released back to the facility on 1/20/21 from skilled nursing home. Staff interviewed confirmed that R1 returned to facility on 1/20/21 and was doing well until 3/2/21 when R1 was brought to emergency room for confusion. This Department has investigated the above allegation. Based on interviews and observation, the Department found that the above allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Unsubstantiated finding indicates that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegation did or did not occur. This report was reviewed with Licensee and a copy of this report was provided.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • Right to sufficient care and qualified staff

    87468.2(a)(4) To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency to meet their needs. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: based on record review, R1 was diagnosed with confusion when discharged from hospital to the facility and R1 needs full assistance in toileting per care plan. Based on interviews, 2 out of 2 staff who assisted R1 were aware of R1’s confusion mental status. However, R1 was still left unattended resulting in R1 sustaining hip fracture due to the fall.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the June 8, 2021 inspection of ROSE GARDEN COURT?

This was a complaint inspection of ROSE GARDEN COURT on June 8, 2021. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to ROSE GARDEN COURT on June 8, 2021?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.