Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

PENDAR'S RESIDENTIAL CARELicense 4352019511 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

It was alleged that the staff did not adequately supervise resident resulting in resident (R1) wandering away from the facility. Based on review of the police report records, it’s noted that R1 was found about 0.2 miles away from the facility running through the parking lot of the shopping center. On 01/30/2025, staff members and the Licensee were interviewed. Based on staff interview 2 staff were working during the time of the incident. It was stated that on 01/23/2025 R1 left the facility from his/her side door and jumped the fence to go to a sandwich shop across the street of the facility. 2 out of 2 staff stated that they were cleaning and assisting other residents when R1 exited the facility. When staff noticed R1 was missing, staff went to look outside and saw an employee of the sandwich shop waving them down to come there. The Licensee stated that R1’s new behavior of leaving the facility began in the beginning of January 2025. Licensee states that they were addressing the behavior by talking to the doctor, following up with R1’s case manager, and they were waiting for R1’s insurance to approve a 1:1 staff. Licensee states that R1’s bedroom door does not have door alarms but stated a plan to buy door alarms for his/her room due to his/her exit-seeking behavior. Licensee also stated a plan to replace the battery for the door alarm at the front door to help notify staff when someone opens the doors. Based on interview with resident (R1), it was stated that he/she likes to leave the facility at least twice a week to go across the street by him/herself, without staff supervision. The review of R1’s records indicates that R1 is not able to leave the facility unassisted. On 01/30/2025, LPA observed that R1’s bedroom is located right next to the front door entrance of the facility. The front door alarm was not operable. R1’s private bedroom has a sliding door which leads to the side of the facility. R1’s sliding door had a door alarm, but the door alarm was not operable. Page 2 of 3. The Department has investigated the above allegation. Based on interview, record review and observation the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the above allegation is substantiated. A deficiency was cited per California Code of Regulation, Title 22. This report was reviewed with Licensee Marie Pendar and a copy of the report and appeal rights were provided. Page 3 of 3. Based on review of the police report, 2 witnesses stated to have observed staff hit R1. Witness (W1) stated to have observed one of the staff swing at R1 but was not sure which of the staff hit R1. It was stated that the incident happened in front of the facility. Witness (W2) stated to have observed of the staff hit R1 multiple times to get into the facility. Resident (R1) was interviewed. Based on interview, R1 denied staff pushing and hitting him/her. R1 did not have any complaints about staff’s treatment towards him/her. The 2 staff members who were part of alleged incident were interviewed. Based on staff interview, 2 out of 2 staff denied pushing and hitting R1. Staff stated a moment while walking back to the facility where the staff was yelling at R1 to “stop” before crossing the crosswalk as there was a bus coming. Staff denied touching R1 while walking back to the facility and before entering the facility. Based on review of the police report, on 01/23/2025, there were no bruises or marks on R1’s body. It was noted that R1 did not seem fearful of the staff. Based on LPA’s observation on 01/30/2025, there were no bruises or marks on R1’s body. R1 did not observe to seem fearful of the staff. The Department has investigated the above allegation. Based on interview, record review and observation the above allegation is unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegation is valid there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. No deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. This report was reviewed with Licensee, Marie Pendar and a copy of the report was provided. Page 2 of 2.

Citations

5 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • Right to sufficient care and qualified staff

    (a) In addition to the rights listed in Section 87468.1, Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities, residents in privately operated residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (4) To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency to meet their needs. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview, and record review the licensee did not ensure resident (R1) was provided supervision to meet R1’s exit seeking behavior resulting in R1 leaving the facility unassisted which poses an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87211(a)(1)(D)Type B

    (a) ... : (1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence of any of the events specified in (A) through (D) below. … (D) Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or health of any resident, ... or unexplained absence of any resident. Based on interview, record review and observation the licensee did not ensure to report R1's elopement incidnet on 04/25/2025 to the Department which poses a potential health, safety and personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • Passageways and stairways kept clear

    (d) The following space and safety provisions shall apply to all facilities: (6) All outdoor and indoor passageways and stairways shall be kept free of obstruction. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview, record review, and observation the licensee did not ensure the front door was not free of obstruction as the front door contained a pad lock at the bottom left side of the front door which poses an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • Coverage for absent regular staff members

    (a) In each facility: (1) When regular staff members are absent, there shall be coverage by personnel with qualifications adequate to perform the assigned tasks. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview, record review and observation the licensee did not ensure that a staff member was present with 4 residents, when 2 out of 2 staff members left to pick up R1 after R1 eloped from the facility which poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87463(b)Type B

    Document required significant condition changes

    (b) The reappraisal shall document significant changes in the resident's physical, mental, cognitive, behavioral, or functional condition, including those required to be documented as specified in Section 87466, Observation of the Resident. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview, record review and observation the licensee did not ensure to update R1’s reappraisal to document R1’s new behavior of elopement which poses a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 19, 2025 inspection of PENDAR'S RESIDENTIAL CARE?

This was a complaint inspection of PENDAR'S RESIDENTIAL CARE on May 19, 2025. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to PENDAR'S RESIDENTIAL CARE on May 19, 2025?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (1 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "(a) In addition to the rights listed in Section 87468.1, Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities, residents in pr..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.