Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Follow-up on corrections

VILA MONTELicense 4352025092 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Christine Dolores and Tracy Pham arrived unannounced to open the initial complaint investigation. During visit, LPAs observed deficiencies in which a case management - deficiencies visit was conducted. LPAs met with Administrator, Nicholas Inneh. Upon arrival to the facility, LPAs was greeted at the front door by staff (S1). Based on review of the facility's staff roster, the individual was not associated to the facility. LPA reviewed Guardian and observed S1 is fingerprint cleared. LPAs reviewed the staff schedule and roster and did not observe 3 other staff members associated to the facility. The 3 staff members were not present during visit nor was scheduled to work today. Administrator was advised to submit the LIC9182 or LIC9188 to associate the staff members to the facility, ASAP. Administrator was advised that the staff members should not be working in the facility until associated. Administrator stated understanding. During interview, LPAs was informed by the Administrator that a resident (R1) was sent out to the hospital for medical treatment and later passed away in the hospital about 2 weeks ago. The individual was still a resident at the facility. The review of the facility's incident reports did not show a death report or incident report was submitted. Administrator verbally confirmed a death report and incident report was not submitted to the Department. LPA Dolores advised the Administrator of Title 22 regulations on reporting requirements. Deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. See LIC809-D. A civil penalty is being assessed for the amount of $500 ($100 per day x 5 days = $500), for staff (S1) working at the facility without association. See LIC421BG. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator, Nicholas Inneh and a copy of the report was provided along with the appeal rights.

Citations

6 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87355(e)(2)Type A

    (e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: (2) Request a transfer of a criminal record clearance as specified in Section 87355(c) or ... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, interview, and observation the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above for staff (S1) working in the facility without association which poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87219(a)Type B

    Based on observation, interview, and record review licensee did not ensure residents were provided activties which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87412(a)Type B

    Based on observation, interview, and record review licensee did not ensure personnel records were maintained at the facility for review which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87458(b)(1)Type A

    Based on observation, record review, and interview resident (R1)'s medical assessment did not include a TB result which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87506(a)Type B

    Based on observation, interview, and record review licensee did not ensure all needs and services plans were signed and that residents did not obtain an updated physician's report which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87211(a)(1)(A)Type A

    (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require, … : (1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence of any of the events specified in (A) through (D) below. … (A) Death of any resident from any cause regardless of where the death occurred, including but not limited to a day program, a hospital, en route to or from a hospital, or visiting away from the facility. Based on record review, interview and observation the licensee did not ensure to submit an incident report and death report for a resident (R1) who was sent to the hospital for medical treatment and who later passed away which poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in care.

    Read full inspector narrative

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 10, 2023 inspection of VILA MONTE?

This was a other inspection of VILA MONTE on May 10, 2023. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to VILA MONTE on May 10, 2023?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (2 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "(e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prio..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.