complaint·November 2, 2023

LPA observed the floors of the resident’s bathrooms contained dark grey stains and black spots. ADM states the bathroom tiles are old and may be stained. ADM sprayed one of the bathroom floors with a cleaning solution and was unable to wipe off the dirt. ADM was able to remove certain dirt marks surrounding the floor of the toilet. The walls of the bathrooms observed with open patches, dirt and dust. LPA observed 2 light fixtures that were broken along the hallways. Based on interview and record review, the Licensee has plans to renovate the facility’s grounds to include (but not limited to) updating all the damaged walls, paint, doors, floors, fence, and parking lot. Licensee is currently in the process of obtaining possible funding from the county to assist with the facility's upcoming renovations. Licensee emailed the letter from the county to LPA Dolores. The Department has investigated the above allegation and the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the above allegation is substantiated. A deficiency is being cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. See LIC9099-D. This report was reviewed with Administrator, Nicholas Inneh and a copy of the report and appeal rights were provided. LPA and ADM entered into 15 resident bedrooms. LPA observed 1 out of 15 rooms had an obvious black marking in the corner of the room. The corner of RM #4 had a black marking next to the resident’s bed. Due to the resident laying in bed sleeping during inspection, LPA was unable to closely observe the black marking in the corner of the room. LPA was unable to determine if the black marking was due to mold, dirt, or cracks in the wood. During the tour of the remainder of the bedrooms, LPA did not observe any obvious mold in the facility. Based on interview with the Administrator, the Administrator has not observed nor was made aware of any mold growing in the facility. ADM states the black marking may be due to the resident touching that area. LPA advised Administrator to have the corner of RM #4 professionally inspected to ensure the area does not have mold. Administrator stated understanding. The Department has investigated the above allegation. Based on interview, record review and observation the above allegation is unsubstantiated. An unsubstantiated finding indicates that although the allegation may have happened and/or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. No deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Advisory note provided. This report was reviewed with Administrator, Nicholas Inneh and a copy of the report was provided.