Public Record
Juliette's Gardens (rose)
Is this your facility?Correct anything the record gets wrong or is out of date.
Researching this facility professionally?Book a 15-minute call
About this facility
Operating details and county context
Operating details
- Capacity
- 6 residents
- Phone
- (408) 393-3882
- Address
- 1511 Ilikai Ave
- Licensed since
Santa Clara County context
258*CCLD
Total facilities
4.6*CCLD
Avg citations
9.5*CCLD
Avg visits
2.9*CCLD
Avg complaint visits
*CCLD: California Community Care Licensing Division. Updated weekly. Last refresh .
Citations
12 citations on record
Every regulation cited on a CCLD inspection of this facility, sourced from the public record. Each row links to the visit’s inspector narrative.
What does Type A vs Type B mean?
Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.
Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.
2025
- 1569.695(c)Type B
Based on record review and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. The facility's last drill was on August 18, 2025. S1 stated that was the only drill conducted in 2025. This poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
2024
- 87307(d)(6)Type A
Passageways and stairways kept clear
Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee did not ensure that sliding exit doors tracks were free of obstruction. LPA observed a pole obstructing the sliding exit door tracks which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
- 87211(a)(1)Type B
Report specified resident events within seven days
87211 Reporting Requirements(a) (1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence of any of the events...This requiement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, ADM did not ensure to report was submitted to the licensing agency when resident being hospitalized after a fall and when two out of three residents had scabies at the facility which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
2023
- 87507(b)Type B
Based on record review and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 1 out of 3 residents did not have a signed LIC 9158 document on file and medical assessment stated the R3 is hearing-imparied and wears a hearing aid which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
- 87507(c)Type B
Admission agreement signing and dating deadline
Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 2 out of 3 residents did not have Admission Agreements signed by Responsible Party and Facility Representative which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
- 87698Type B
Based on observation and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 1 out 3 residents had half-side bed rails attached to the bed without a written order from their physician which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
- 87705(c)(5)Type B
Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 3 out of 3 residents with demenita diagnosis did not have an updated Phyician's Report, LIC 602A and updated appraisal/needs and services plan which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
- 00000Type B
Based on record review,, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 1 out of 3 residents did not have a signed copy of Personal Rights of Residents on file which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
- 87207Type A
Prohibit false or misleading facility statements
Based on record review, interview and observation, R1's medications were counted during today's visit, the tablets/capsules in the prescription bottle did not match the doses given R1 based on the Medication Administration Record (MAR). This concludes the facility staff noted doses were given to R1 when medication was not adminstered, which poses an immediate Health, Safety, or Personal Rights risk to persons in care.
- 87411(a)Type A
Facility personnel sufficiency and competence
Based on record review, interview and observation R1's 4 out of 10 medications not administered to R1 as prescribed by the physician which poses an immediate Health, Safety, or Personal Rights risk to persons in care.
- 87307(a)Type A
Living accommodations aligned with facility function
Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 3 out of 3 resident rooms had cameras facing the resident's bed and resident file did not have consent forms, updated Plan of Operations, or facility waiver for video surveillance in the private areas which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
- 87457(c)(1)Type B
Minimum appraisal documentation requirements
Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 2 out of 3 residents did not have Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan on file and 1 out of 3 residents did not have Functional Capabilities Assessment on file which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Inspection record
8 visits on record since 2021. Most recent on 2025-09-17.
5 routine inspections, 3 complaint visits. 1 complaint on record, 1 of 1 substantiated.
- Inspection1 Type BRead inspector’s narrative
- Inspection1 Type ARead inspector’s narrative
- Complaint1 Type BRead inspector’s narrative
- Inspection3 Type A · 6 Type BRead inspector’s narrative
- InspectionNo citationsRead inspector’s narrative
- InspectionNo citationsRead inspector’s narrative
12 citations across the record on file
Nearby
Other licensed assisted living facilities in San Jose
FAQ
Common questions about this facility
Is Juliette's Gardens (rose) licensed in California?
Yes, Juliette's Gardens (rose) is currently licensed in California. It has been licensed since 2016.
How many citations does Juliette's Gardens (rose) have?
Juliette's Gardens (rose) has 12 citations on record: 4 Type A (more serious) and 8 Type B citations. It has received 8 visits (5 inspections, 3 complaint visits).
When was Juliette's Gardens (rose) last inspected?
Juliette's Gardens (rose) was last inspected on September 17, 2025 (about 9 months ago). California inspects licensed assisted living facilities (RCFEs) on a periodic basis or following a complaint.
What type of assisted living facility is Juliette's Gardens (rose)?
Juliette's Gardens (rose) is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE), which is a licensed assisted living facility serving older adults with a licensed capacity of 6 residents. It is located in San Jose, Santa Clara County, California.
How does Juliette's Gardens (rose) compare to other assisted living facilities in Santa Clara County?
Juliette's Gardens (rose) has 12 citations. The county average is 4.6 citations per facility. There are 258 assisted living facilities in Santa Clara County.
Does Juliette's Gardens (rose) have any serious violations?
Juliette's Gardens (rose) has 4 Type A citations on record. Type A citations indicate conditions that pose an immediate health or safety risk to residents. Review the inspection timeline above for details on each citation.
Has Juliette's Gardens (rose) had any complaint inspections?
Juliette's Gardens (rose) has received 3 complaint-triggered inspections. 1 resulted in substantiated findings. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern to CCLD.
Next steps for this record
If this is your facility,and correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.
Researching professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.