complaint·October 2, 2024

On 9/4/2024, LPA Partoza, interviewed resident 1 (R1). R1 stated prior to moving in to the facility. R1 was assessed and the facility was aware that R1 uses an assistive device to transfer and does not require a two person assist when transferring. On 8/29/24 and 9/4/2024, LPA interviewed 3 staff, 3 out of 3 staff stated that R1 did not need a two person assist. Based on review of the facility's pre-admission assessment dated 12/31/2023, and reappraisal assessment dated 01/31/2024, the facility is able to meet the need of the resident. On 7/12/2024, based on record review, R1 was re-assessed by the Resident Services Director (RSD), and stated on the report that R1 required extensive assistance with dressing, continence, and transfer ability. Based on document reviews, R1's level of care has changed from the date the resident moved in to the facility to the date R1 was re-assessed. Based on the assessment the Community can no longer meet the need of the resident. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. No deficiencies are being cited during today's visit based on California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22. An exit interview was conducted with Executive Director/Administrator (ED/ADM) Felicia Barkley. A copy of the report was provided. page 2 of 2 end of report