Complaint·March 6, 2023

Staff S1 stated during interview to have brought a coffee mug with hot water to R1. S1 stated S1 attempted to place the coffee mug on R1's bedroom table, but R1 moved the table right before S1 was going to place the coffee mug on the table, resulting in the coffee mug spilling. S1 stated about half the water from the coffee mug spilled out. S1 stated some of the water spilled on R1's stomach area and there was a visible stain of water on R1's shirt. S1 stated to have asked R1 if R1 was hurt by the hot water and R1 said no. S1 stated to have told R1 S1 could take R1 to the hospital if the hot water burned R1, but R1 declined. S1 stated to have checked R1 for burns immediately and again that night and the next day and did not observe any burns. S1 stated to be certain to have used a coffee mug and not a stove pot. Based on information from interviews conducted with staff, and records reviewed, although the allegation listed above may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated. No deficiencies were cited under California Code of Regulations Title 22. This report was reviewed with ADM Taa and a copy of the report was provided. Page 2 of 2. END REPORT.