Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

MERRILL GARDENS AT GILROYLicense 435202806
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On 12/15/2023, 6 staff members were interviewed. Based on staff interview, there were a couple residents who were diagnosed with scabies on separate occasions (10/26/2023 and 11/06/2023), but as of 12/15/2023 the residents no longer had scabies. It was stated that some residents did not have a confirmed diagnosis of scabies and were experiencing symptoms of itchiness. These residents’ physicians were notified and prescribed a PRN medication. The review of records show that R1 was noted to have itchiness and redness on 10/26/2023. Based on staff interview, R1 was diagnosed with scabies. R1’s hospice nurse was notified and R1 was prescribed and applied a PRN medication. Staff noted R2 was experiencing symptoms of itchiness. R2’s doctor and authorized representative was notified, and R2 was prescribed a PRN medication. R2 was also being seen by a home health agency for another condition. Staff stated that R3’s itching was caused by dry skin. R3’s doctor was informed and prescribed a PRN medication. Staff denied the observation of R3’s skin being red and bumpy. R4 was noted to be under hospice care. Staff stated that R4 was not exhibiting any symptoms. The review of R4’s records did not include notes of a diagnosis of scabies or symptoms of itchiness. Staff stated that R5 was being seen by a home health agency and was not experiencing any symptoms of scabies. The review of R5’s records did not include notes of a diagnosis of scabies or symptoms of itchiness. It was alleged that staff are not discarding PPE gowns after assisting residents who are under isolation or quarantine because they were not told to discard it. It was also alleged that residents who were experiencing symptoms of scabies were not placed under quarantine. Page 2 of 3. On 12/15/2023, 6 staff members were interviewed. Based on staff interview, 6 out of 6 staff members stated they discarded the PPE gowns after every use. Based on review of the facility’s infection control plan, it’s stated that items and equipment that are single-use shall be disposed of in an appropriate waste container with a tight-fitting cover. Based on staff interview, the gowns being used are disposable and they are disposed in the trash bin upon exiting the resident rooms, which is located next to the isolation room. Staff stated that resident’s who were suspected to have scabies and were experiencing symptoms of scabies were placed under isolation until they were informed of a diagnosis from the resident’s physicians. Those who were experiencing itchy skin due to a condition not related to scabies (example dry skin), were not placed under quarantine . Based on review of the facility’s infection control plan, it’s stated there shall be separation and care of residents whose illness requires separation, including quarantine or isolation, from others. The Department has investigated the above allegations. Based on interview, record review and observation the above allegations are unfounded, meaning the allegations are false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. No deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. This report was reviewed with Health Services Director, Jocelyne Bailon and a copy of the report was provided. Page 3 of 3.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87463(a)(3)Type A

    (a) The pre-admission appraisal shall be updated, in writing as frequently as necessary to note significant changes and to keep the appraisal accurate. The reappraisals shall document changes in the resident's physical, medical, mental, and social condition. Significant changes shall include but not be limited to: (3) Any illness, injury, trauma, or change in the health care needs of the resident that results in a circumstance or condition specified in Sections 87455(c) … This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview, record review, and observation the licensee did not comply with the section cited above wherein the facility did not reassess R1 after 11/30/2023, even though R1 continued to be a fall risk and had multiple falls resulting in injuries after 11/30/2023 which poses an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to persons in care.

    Read full inspector narrative

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 6, 2024 inspection of MERRILL GARDENS AT GILROY?

This was a complaint inspection of MERRILL GARDENS AT GILROY on December 6, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to MERRILL GARDENS AT GILROY on December 6, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.