Complaint·June 9, 2023

The Department interviewed two individuals who were witnesses to R1 having possessions go missing (W1 & W2). W1 stated that they have observed R1's clothing go missing. W1 stated that they have taken pictures of all of W1's personal items, so they know when something goes missing. In an interview with W2, W2 stated that they have also observed items go missing, and have also observed R1 wearing other resident's clothing. W2 stated that the facility is quick to correct matters of missing or mistaken clothing when made aware. W2 stated that the facility offers to reimburse missing articles of clothing upon provision of proof of purchase. W2 stated that to their knowledge, none of R1's clothes have permanently gone missing, and that the clothing has always turned up in the facility eventually. LPA reviewed R1's record to determine whether they have an inventory of personal property to cross reference with items present in R1's room. R1 opted out of the optional personal property inventory process upon admission into the facility. No inventory was found to exist for cross referencing. In interview with Administrator, Admin confirmed that the facility is willing to reimburse lost articles of clothing upon provision of proof of purchase. Admin has stated that no proof of purchase evidence has been provided to the facility for replacement of missing items. Based on information from interviews conducted with staff, residents, and witnesses and records reviewed, although the allegation listed above may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur; therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED . No deficiencies cited under Title 22 during this visit. Report was reviewed with and signed by Administrator San Sor and a copy was provided.