Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

OAKMONT OF SAN JOSELicense 4352028181 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On 12/26/2023, resident (R1) began to develop flu-like symptoms. R1’s responsible party was made aware. The review of records shows that on 12/26/2023 around 11:00PM, R1’s responsible party contacted the facility to follow-up on R1’s condition. R1’s responsible party instructed the facility staff to monitor R1’s condition as R1 was not feeling well. It was noted during NOC shift that R1 had on and off coughing and was not feeling well but slept through the night. On 12/27/2023, between 6:30AM – 7:00AM, staff observed resident was sleeping. Around 8:00AM, staff checked R1. At 9:00AM, staff contacted R1’s responsible party regarding R1’s condition. R1 was observed to be wheezing, had a runny nose, and coughing. R1’s responsible party was stated to be on the way to the facility within an hour. Record review shows that after the telephone call to R1’s responsible party staff offered R1 breakfast, which R1 initially refused. Staff (S8) offered R1 yogurt and water, which R1 partially consumed prior to taking his/her medications. R1 was observed to be responsive but weak. Around 10:00AM, R1’s responsible party arrived to the facility and observed R1 laying in bed, unresponsive, and pale in color. R1’s responsible party contacted emergency services and R1 was then transported to the hospital. 8 staff members were interviewed. 5 out of 8 staff interviewed were familiar with R1’s care. 1 out of 5 staff members stated the observation of R1 looking weak the night before he/she went to the hospital (12/26/2023). 5 out of 5 staff stated the observation of R1 feeling unwell the morning of 12/27/2023. Based on interview, staff did not offer to contact emergency medical services when the initial telephone call was made to the RP. Staff stated they did not offer to contact medical services because RP stated to be on the way. The review of medical records shows that upon arrival of emergency medical services, R1 had an altered level of consciousness, shortness of breath, and a fever. R1 was hospitalized and diagnosed with a life-threatening infection and virus. PAGE 2 OF 3. On 12/26/2023, resident (R1) began to develop flu-like symptoms. Around 6:00PM, R1’s responsible party spoke with R1 who only speaks another language but English. R1 told his/her responsible party that his/her head was hurting all day and was not feeling well. The responsible party contacted staff and requested to dispense a PRN medication for R1. R1’s responsible party arrived to the facility about 45 minutes after the telephone call, and was informed by R1 that he/she has not yet received their PRN medication. Based on record review, the physician’s order for R1’s PRN medication states an instruction for “as needed”. R1’s PRN medication was dispensed around 8:00PM on 12/26/2023. Throughout the investigation, 3 witnesses were interviewed. 3 out of 3 witnesses denied recording a resident without consent. 3 out of 3 witnesses denied the observation of another visitor recording a resident without consent. 7 out of 7 staff members interviewed denied the observation of a visitor recording a resident without consent The Department has investigated the above allegation. Based on interview, record review and observation the above allegation is unfounded meaning the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. No deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. A case management visit was conducted due to a violation observed. See LIC809 on 05/10/2024. This report was reviewed with Interim Executive Director, Christopher Schuster and a copy of the report was provided. Throughout the investigation, 7 staff members were interviewed. Based on interview, 6 out of 7 staff members stated R1 receives showers during his/her shower schedule days. 1 out of 7 staff members was not familiar with R1’s care as R1 was assigned to another group. S1 stated that staff were instructed to wait until R1’s family member arrived before staff could assist R1 with showers. S1 states that sometimes R1 needed to wait to be assisted with a shower if staff were busy assisting other residents. The review of records indicates that R1 is scheduled for showers three times a week. 7 out of 7 staff members interviewed denied restricting any visitors in the facility. 7 out of 7 staff members denied restricting any areas of the facility for visitors. Throughout the investigation, 3 witnesses were interviewed. 3 out of 3 witnesses denied being restricted visitation at the facility. 3 out of 3 witnesses denied the observation of any areas of the facility being restricted for other visitors. The review of records indicates that from October 2023 – December 2023, R1’s care was increased to a total of 65 acuity points and 61 billable points. Care items that were increased from October 2023 – December 2023 included grooming, toileting, assistive devices, outside providers, restless behaviors, verbally disruptive behaviors, delusions and hallucination behaviors, and disturbed sleep behaviors. 7 out of 7 staff members were interviews. Based on interview, R1 required total care and full assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) care. The Department has investigated the above allegations. Based on interview, record review and observation the above allegation is unsubstantiated. An unsubstantiated finding indicates that although the allegation may have happened and/or is valid there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. No deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. This report was reviewed with Interim Executive Director, Christopher Schuster and a copy of the report was provided. The Department has investigated the above allegation. Based on interview, record review and observation the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the above allegation is substantiated. An immediate civil penalty of $500 is being assessed today for serious bodily injury. Additional civil penalties are pending review. A deficiency is being cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. See LIC9099-D. This report was reviewed with Interim Executive Director, Christopher Schuster and a copy of the report and appeal rights were provided. PAGE 3 OF 3.

Citations

7 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87466Type A

    Regular observation and documentation of resident changes

    The licensee shall ensure that residents are regularly observed for changes in physical, mental, emotional and social functioning and that appropriate assistance is provided when such observation reveals unmet needs. When changes such as unusual weight gains or losses or deterioration of mental ability or a physical health condition are observed, the licensee shall ensure that such changes are documented and brought to the attention of the resident's physician and the resident's responsible person, if any. Based on interview, record review and observation the licensee did not ensure to immediately inform resident (R1)'s physician of R1's change of condition on 12/26/2023 which poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • Right to sufficient care and qualified staff

    (a) In addition to the rights listed in Section 87468.1, Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities, residents in privately operated residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (4) To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency to meet their needs. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview, record review, and observation the licensee did not ensure resident (R1) was provided a PRN medication within a timely manner and waited about 2 hours before it was dispensed which poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in care

  • 87411(a)Type A

    Facility personnel sufficiency and competence

    87411 Personnel Requirements – General (a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. In facilities licensed for sixteen or more, sufficient support staff shall be employed to ensure provision of personal assistance and care... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, R1 needed more assistance with incontinence and there was not enough staff to be able to cater for the needs of R1 which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87457(a)(2)Type A

    87457 Pre-Admission Appraisal – General (a)Prior to admission, the prospective resident and his/her responsible person, if any, shall be interviewed by the licensee or the employee responsible for facility admissions. (2) The prospective resident's desires regarding admission, and his/her background, including any specific service needs, medical background and functional limitations shall be discussed. This requirement is not met as evidenced by:Based on interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above due to staff wasn't able to conduct skin check to determine if there is pressure injury on R1 prior to admission which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87463(a)(3)Type A

    87463 Reappraisals (a)The pre-admission appraisal shall be updated, in writing as frequently as necessary to note significant changes and to keep the appraisal accurate...Significant changes shall include but not be limited to: (3) Any illness, injury, trauma, or change in the health care needs of the resident that results in a circumstance or condition... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and records review, facility did not do a reappraisal based on the need of R1 for toileting due to a medication that causes her to urinate a large amount which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • Give PRN medication by physician order

    87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (c) If the resident's physician has stated in writing that the resident is unable to determine his/her own need for nonprescription PRN medication but can communicate his/her symptoms clearly (2)Once ordered by the physician the medication is given according to the physician's directions. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and records review, the instructions of the PRN medication prescribed by the physician was not followed. Medication was only applied on random days, not every change in diaper or bowel movement which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • Arrange appropriate medical and dental care

    (a) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility. The plan shall encourage routine medical and dental care and provide for assistance in obtaining such care, by compliance with the following: (1) The licensee shall arrange, or assist in arranging, for medical and dental care appropriate to the conditions and needs of residents. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview, record review, and observation the licensee did not ensure to seek timely medication attention for resident (R1) resulting in hospitalization which poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 10, 2024 inspection of OAKMONT OF SAN JOSE?

This was a complaint inspection of OAKMONT OF SAN JOSE on May 10, 2024. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to OAKMONT OF SAN JOSE on May 10, 2024?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (1 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "The licensee shall ensure that residents are regularly observed for changes in physical, mental, emotional and social fu..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.