Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Incident investigation

IVY PARK AT PALO ALTOLicense 4352029291 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On July 03, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kiran Jain arrived unannounced at the facility to conduct a Case Management – Incident visit regarding an incident that occurred on 06/20/2025 when the resident (R1) eloped from the facility. Upon arrival, LPA met with the Executive Director (ED), Stephanie Brice, and disclosed the purpose of the visit. LPA interviewed one (1) staff member: ED, and one (1) resident (R1). The ED stated that on 06/20/2025, at approximately 7 PM, S1 responded to the first-floor stairwell exit alarm. S1 did not see anyone around the exit, so S1 immediately called out on the walkie-talkie for the team to start apartment checks to ensure all residents were accounted for. At approximately 7:05 PM, S1 reported to the ED that R1 could not be located. Apartment checks continued, and other facility staff members began searching the outside areas and the immediate neighborhood. ED stated R1 lives on the fourth floor, and they are not sure if R1 took stairs from the fourth or any other floor. ED stated that at approximately 7:10 PM, the facility received a call from R1's former Physical Therapist (PT), who stated that R1 was with them and that they were bringing R1 back to the community. The ED contacted R1’s Responsible Party (RP) to inform them about the incident. R1 was brought back to the community. The PT informed the ED that they had seen R1 at the corner of El Camino and California Avenue. R1 stated that they had gone for a walk but forgot how to get back. ED stated that before the elopement incident on 06/20/2025, R1 was not wearing a safety bracelet. But after R1 returned, the facility ensured that R1 is wearing wander guard bracelet all the time. Med techs are checking three times a day to ensure R1 is wearing a wander guard bracelet. Continued on LIC809-C LPA reviewed R1’s Physician’s Report (LIC 602), dated 03/30/2025, R1 was non-ambulatory, had a primary diagnosis of Alzheimer's Dementia, was deemed not able to leave the facility unassisted. LPA reviewed R1’s Individualized Service Plan (ISP), dated 04/01/2025, which stated that R1 was ambulatory and unable to leave the community unsupervised. The ISP further stated that R1 was required to wear a safety bracelet while residing in the Assisted Living. LPA conducted a health and wellness check on R1 by visiting R1’s room. R1 stated that they did not have any recollection of whether they had exited the building alone without anyone accompanying them. R1 also stated that they liked to walk outside and inside the facility and use the elevators to go down to the first floor. R1 resided in the Assisted Living unit of the facility and was not wearing a safety bracelet at the time of the elopement. Facility staff did not ensure that R1 didn’t leave the facility unaccompanied, and a safety bracelet was not placed on R1’s arm prior to the elopement incident. Facility staff placed a wander guard bracelet on R1 only after the elopement incident occurred on 06/20/2025. A deficiency was cited based on LPA observations, records reviewed, and interviews conducted in accordance with the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, see LIC809D. An exit interview was conducted, and Plans of Correction were reviewed and developed with the Executive Director. A copy of this report and appeal rights were discussed and provided to the Executive Director, Stephanie Brice, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of these documents.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87411(a)Type A

    87411 Personnel Requirements – General (a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs.This requirement was not met as evidenced by: The facility staff were not able to prevent the resident (R1) from eloping the facility. R1 has dementia, is deemed not able to leave the facility unassisted, and was able to leave the facility unaccompanied around 7 PM on 06/20/2025, which posed an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 3, 2025 inspection of IVY PARK AT PALO ALTO?

This was a other inspection of IVY PARK AT PALO ALTO on July 3, 2025. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to IVY PARK AT PALO ALTO on July 3, 2025?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (1 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "87411 Personnel Requirements – General (a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.