Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

BONITA SPRINGS SENIOR LIVINGLicense 435202959
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Page 2 of 3. On 02/05/2026, LPA Rai interviewed staff (S1) and Administrator (ADM) Dulce Cera. Both staff reviewed the facility records to review the list of residents that passed away at the facility in 2025. Both staff stated resident (R1) was a resident who stayed at the facility for less than a month in 2025. Both staff stated R1 moved to the facility on 10/02/2025 and R1 was admitted to hospice services at the facility the same day. Both staff stated R1 passed away at the facility on 10/08/2025 under Hospice services and in terms of the addendum to Admission Agreement, the facility is not issuing a refund, but in this case, they made an exception. Both staff stated R1’s responsible party was provided with a refund check, and it was cashed out within the week. Based on review of R1’s Admission Agreement effective admission date 10/02/2025, page 5 out of 16, “in the event of your death, a pro-rated refund of prepaid rates will be made from the date that all of your personal belongings are removed from your room. Refunds will be processed within fifteen (15) days. R1’s admission agreement is signed by R1’s responsible party (RP). Based on review of R1’s Addendum to Admission Agreement, “No Refund for Hospice Admissions: In the Event that a resident is admitted to the Facility wile already under the care of hospice agency, the Facility shall not issue any refunds of paid fees in the event of the resident’s discharge or death.” and it was signed by R1’s responsible party on 10/01/2025. Based on review of R1’s refund check dated 10/20/2025, the check was issued to R1’s responsible party and memo on the check stated, “Refund of room and board charges for R1”. Based on review of facility’s bank records, R1’s refund check dated 10/20/2025 was cashed out on 10/23/2025. During today’s visit, LPA Rai interviewed 4 staff (S1-S3), including Administrator (ADM) Dulce Cera. LPA Rai wanted to clarify the amount of money issued on the refund check. ADM stated the amount decided for R1’s refund check was 30% of the monthly rate and preadmission fee. ADM stated R1’s responsible party was agreeable to the amount of the refund check as the check was cashed, and no issues were brought up to ADM. Page 3 of 3. The Department has completed the investigation of the above allegation. Based on interviews conducted and record reviews, the Department has found that the above allegation were UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation were false, could not have happened and/or are without a reasonable basis. No deficiencies cited from California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Exit interview conducted with Human Resources (HR) Aisha Syed and a copy of the report was provided.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 12, 2026 inspection of BONITA SPRINGS SENIOR LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of BONITA SPRINGS SENIOR LIVING on March 12, 2026. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to BONITA SPRINGS SENIOR LIVING on March 12, 2026?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.