Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Based on the document review, R1 does not take his/her medication at home resulting to a severe schizoaffective disorder, bipolar and catatonia. R1 has history of mental illness, R1 is able to ambulate and is able to leave the facility unassisted as stated on his/her physician's report (LIC 602). R1 has mild cognitive disorder. R1 was admitted to the hospital from 02/06/25 and was discharged on 07/17/25. R1 was admitted due to history of odd behaviors and changing cognition. R1 moved to the facility after discharged from the hospital. Based on observation. LPA observed at the time of the visit on on 10/03/25, that R1 called a family member and alleges that he/she was being maltreated. Family called the facility and ADM assured R1s family member that R1 is unharmed. At the same time R1 called his/her case manager from Telecare and stated that there is an emergency happening at the facility. R1s CM called the facility to confirm, ADM assured CM that R1 is unharmed and no emergency or EMT personnel is at the facility. R1 approached LPA and stated to LPA that he/she was beaten on his/her arms, shoulder, body. LPA did not observed any bruising on R1s arms or legs. R1 followed LPA while LPA was conducting inspection of the facility on 10/03/25. LPA did not observed R1 to be in pain. Based on interview, observation and document review, the department has investigated the complaint alleging that, staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in resident sexually abusing another resident. We have found that the complaint was unfounded , meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. No deficiencies were cited during today's visit based on the California Code of Regulation (CCR) Title 22. An exit interview was conducted with LIC/ADM Samuel Apostol and a copy of the report was provided. Page 2 of 2 end of report

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87411(b)Type A

    87411 General Personnel Requirement (b)All persons who supervise employees or who supervise or care for residents shall be at least eighteen (18) years of age. This requirment is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, LIC/ADM did not ensure that S2 was at least 18 years of age at time of hire S2 on 10/08/2024. S2s CA ID/DL confirms S2 is under age18. S2 works partime at the facility, which pose/poses an immediate health, safety & personal rights risks to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the November 10, 2025 inspection of SOUTH COUNTY RETIREMENT HOME INC.?

This was a complaint inspection of SOUTH COUNTY RETIREMENT HOME INC. on November 10, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to SOUTH COUNTY RETIREMENT HOME INC. on November 10, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.