Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

DOMINICAN OAKSLicense 440708773
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

During interview on 08/01/2024, S1 stated to have never spoken inappropriately to R1. Staff S2 and S4-S6 stated to have never observed S1 speak inappropriately to R1. During interview on 10/18/2024, S3 stated that R1 complained to S3 that R1 asked S1 to pick up an item from the floor and S1 refused. During visits on 08/01/2024 and 10/29/2024, LPA Marrufo interviewed an additional 13 residents. 1 out of 13 interviewed residents stated to have observed a staff speak inappropriately to residents but did not provide the name of the staff. 12 out of 13 interviewed residents stated to have not observed staff speak inappropriately to residents. Family Member FM1 stated in a written statement to LPA Marrufo on 07/21/2024 that on 03/13/2024, S1 left R1 on the toilet, left R1’s room, and told R1 to call S1. During interview on 10/21/2024, resident R1 stated that S1 assisted R1 to the toilet and while R1 was on the toilet, S1 told R1 that S1 had to go to another apartment and would be right back. R1 stated that R1 was left alone on the toilet for approximately 10 minutes. R1 stated S1 returned to R1 and assisted R1 off the toilet. R1 stated to not remember if there were more times S1 left R1 on the toilet. R1’s Physician’s Report completed on 02/09/2023 states R1 is able to care for his/her own toileting needs with assistance and states R1 is ambulatory. R1’s Physician’s Report completed on 05/06/2024 states R1 is not able to care for his/her own toileting needs and states R1 is non-ambulatory. R1’s Physician’s Report completed on 10/08/2024 states R1 is able to care for his/her own toileting needs and states R1 is ambulatory. Page 2 of 5. The Toileting Section on page 14 of the Employee Handbook states, “1. Escort the resident to the toilet. Provide transfer assistance as necessary. Provide privacy. 2. If appropriate and safe, step out of the bathroom. a. If your community uses call lights be sure it is within the resident’s reach. b. If not, stay nearby so the resident may call out to you when he/she is finished. c. Never leave a resident alone on the toilet for a long period of time.” During visit on 10/29/2024, LPA toured R1’s living unit. LPA observed emergency pull cords in R1’s bathroom near R1’s toilet and in R1’s bedroom. LPA observed R1 was not wearing an emergency pendant necklace. R1 stated not to own an emergency pendant necklace. LPA Marrufo pulled the emergency pull cord in R1’s bathroom and a staff responded to the pull cord in 2 minutes and 25 seconds. LPA Marrufo obtained a copy of the Assisted Living Residential Care Conference that S2 wrote on 03/12/2023. The document records a conference between S2, FM1, and R1. The document Comments section states, “Explained that staff are task oriented and will be able to provide care at scheduled times + as needed. Also, explained that wait periods are not unusual, as staff are trained to complete the task they are involved with before moving on to another resident request. Wait periods could range from 5min-30minutes. Res. acknowledged + seemed to accept that there may be times when [R1] will be on [R1’s] own and staff will come to provide care on a schedule established upon move-in. Informed [R1] and [FM1] that we do not have a large staff to provide 1:1 companion care or extended periods of time to complete resident tasks outside of bathing, dressing, toileting, + escorts.” R1’s Family Member (FM1) sent LPA Marrufo an email on 07/21/2024 stating that FM1 spoke with staff S2 on 02/20/2024. FM1 stated that S2 stated that staff are allowed to leave a resident on the toilet and leave the apartment. FM1 stated S2 stated that staff are not going to wait 20 minutes for a resident to defecate. During interview on 08/01/2024, S1 stated to have never left R1 on the toilet for a long period of time. S1 stated the staff are not supposed to do that. Page 3 of 5. During interview on 08/01/2024, staff S4 stated that R1 complained to S4 that S1 left R1 on the bathroom. S4 stated to have reported R1’s complaint to S4’s supervisor and management. During interview on 08/01/2024, S2 stated that R1 reported that R1 was left on the toilet for a long time, but S2 did not witness the incident. S2 stated that S1 stated to have told R1 that S1 needed to step out and would come back and that R1 agreed to have S1 leave. S2 stated to not recall why S1 stated S1 needed to step out. During interview on 10/01/2024, staff S1 stated to have never left R1 on the toilet and walked out of R1’s apartment. S1 stated to have only stepped out of R1’s bathroom when R1 requested privacy. S1 stated S1 would stay outside R1’s bathroom door and would enter the bathroom again when R1 told S1 that R1 was ready for S1 to enter the bathroom again. During interview on 10/18/2024, staff S3 stated that R1 told S3 that S1 told R1 that S1 was busy and left R1 on the toilet for more than half an hour. S3 stated to have remembered at least three other times that R1 told S3 that S1 left R3 on the toilet. S3 stated that when S3 has assisted R1 on the toilet and received a call to assist another resident, S3 has called another staff to assist the other resident. S3 stated to have never left R1’s apartment while R1 was on the toilet. During interview on 10/21/2024, FM1 stated to have been walking towards R1’s apartment and came across S1 in the hallway to R1’s apartment. FM1 stated that S1 told FM1 that R1 was on the toilet and it way “okay” for S1 to leave to go next door to help a neighboring resident. During visits on 08/01/2024 and 10/29/2024, LPA Marrufo interviewed 13 additional residents. 5 out of 13 interviewed residents stated to have no need for toileting assistance from staff. 7 out of 13 interviewed residents stated that staff ensure their toileting needs are met. 1 out of 13 interviewed residents stated that staff have left him/her on the toilet for 10 minutes before returning to continue assisting the resident on the toilet. The resident stated that the staff who left him/her was not S1. Page 4 of 5. LPA Marrufo obtained facility invoices for purchases of fruits and vegetables for the following dates: 04/24/2024, 05/01/2024, 06/05/2024, and 06/24-28/2024. On 08/01/2024, LPA Marrufo observed meal services and interviewed 14 residents. 12 out of 14 interviewed residents stated to like the food at the facility. 2 out of 14 interviewed residents stated to not like the food at the facility. 12 out of 14 interviewed residents stated to have never been served spoiled fruits or vegetables. 2 out of 14 interviewed residents stated to have been served spoiled fruits or vegetables. LPA did not observe any foods that did not appear to be of good quality during meal service, including spoiled fruits or vegetables. LPA toured the facility kitchen and observed the food supplies, including the supplies of fruits and vegetables in the walk-in refrigerator. On 08/01/2024, LPA interviewed 5 staff. 5 out of 5 interviewed staff stated that the food is of good quality, and they have never observed staff be served spoiled fruits or vegetables. On 10/29/2024, LPA Marrufo interviewed 7 additional residents. 6 out of 7 interviewed residents stated that they think the facility food is of good quality. 1 out of 7 interviewed residents stated he/she thinks the facility food is not of good quality. 7 out of 7 interviewed residents stated to have not been served spoiled fruits or vegetables. An Advisory Note was issued. See LIC9102 for more information. Based on information from interviews conducted with staff, residents, and a family member of a resident, and records reviewed, although the allegations listed above may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegations are unsubstantiated. No Deficiencies cited under California Code of Regulations Title 22 This report was reviewed with Administrator Amy Saulnier and a copy of this report was provided. Page 5 of 5. END REPORT.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the November 6, 2024 inspection of DOMINICAN OAKS?

This was a complaint inspection of DOMINICAN OAKS on November 6, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to DOMINICAN OAKS on November 6, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.