Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

MONTECITO MANORLicense 445202356
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

LPA Marrufo was able to interview RP and it was shared that R1 actually had a bad UTI that was missed, so R1 was treated like he/she was totally out of their mind because R1 has mental illness. LPA Maruufo also interviewed three staff members. S1 mentioned that he/she hasn’t noticed anyone with urinary tract infection (UTI). S1 also has observed R1 to be wanting his/her family member (F1) to be with him/her 100% of the time. When F1 leaves, R1 moves his/her arms and legs and wants to smoke, but when her F1 comes, he/she doesn’t move his/her arms or legs. S2 shared that there has not really been anything S2 have seen where a resident has a change of condition. S2 has also observed that R1 acts weird when R1s family is here. When the family is not here, R1 can get out of bed and walk to the bathroom. R1 walks and goes to the toilet by himself/herself. R1 sometimes needs a little bit of help to clean. R1 puts his/her clothes together. S3 added that R1 went into the hospital about a week ago on a Tuesday or Wednesday. R1 went to the hospital for a UTI. Staff didn’t really observe any changes in R1 before that. R1 has always been a little slouched over all the time since R1 got here. Based on records review, R1 was seen by P1, on 8/1/2023, who came to the facility to check on other residents. P1 is not R1s primary care physician. R1 was sent to the hospital due to P1s observation of R1 not looking right. R1 was sent and came back with a diagnosis of UTI. Last observation recorded in the progress notes was from 7/20/2023. Regarding the allegation of staff did not ensure record of centrally stored medications was complete, RP stated that a staff (S1) said he/she is giving R1s antibiotic but when RP looked at the medication list last Friday (8/4/2023) the antibiotic was not listed. LPA Donato reviewed the documents obtained by LPA Marrufo. It was shown in the Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Records (CSMDR) that the start date of the antibiotic prescribed by the doctor was on 8/3/2023, it was filled by the pharmacy on 8/2/2023. page 2 of 3 During the interview, S3 mentioned that R1 came back from the hospital on Thursday night or the week before. R1 was prescribed new medications. It was an antibiotic. R1 was given the medication according to the doctor’s prescription. S3 believes it was every 8 hours. It was a capsule. For the allegation of staff do not provide water to residents, RP stated that R1 does not have access to water. RP stated when they showed up to visit, R1 was in bed and was unable to get up and did not have water anywhere within her reach. RP stated R1’s roommate also asked for water. RP stated there is a water dispenser out front but the residents cannot get to it if they can’t get out of bed. During LPA Marrufo’s interview, when asked if they did you ask staff to provide R1 with water? RP answered that yes, that has been a constant thing every day that they are there. Even the other residents there have asked RP for glasses of water. It has been different since O1 have been there. They have water that they are bringing from the kitchen. According to staff interviews, three out of three mentioned that staff provide enough water for residents. S1 mentioned that residents are provided water all the time, especially with R1. R1 asks for juice and water all the time. We give them water for all three meals per day. R1 would get more water. R1 would get water every 15-20 minutes. She asks for a lot of water. S2 also shared that for R1, he/she drinks a lot. R1 requests a lot of water. We give a pitcher by the bed. At meals, R1 would request for a large glass and put a straw because R1 would drop it all the time. R1 would drink 3 glasses of water with meals. There is a water station in the hallway. It is for all the residents. Based on interviews & records reviews, the department has determined that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Report is reviewed and copy is provided. page 3 of 3

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 9, 2025 inspection of MONTECITO MANOR?

This was a complaint inspection of MONTECITO MANOR on January 9, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to MONTECITO MANOR on January 9, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.