complaint·September 10, 2024

The week of 04/29/2024 to 05/05/2024, S1 worked on Monday, 04/29/2024 on the morning shift and Friday, 05/03/2024, on the afternoon shift. Administrative staff ruled out the incident occurring between S1 and R1 on Monday, 04/29/2024 because R1 was not in his/her room during the morning shift. For the afternoon shift on Friday, 05/03/2024, S1 was working with 2 caregivers (S2) and (S3). S2 and S3 did not mention anything unusual while working with S1. Residents interviewed also did not mention any issues with S1. Based on interview with S1, S1 denied the allegations. It was stated that on 05/03/2024, the only incident he/she remembered with R1 was attempting to clean R1 after R1 defecated. S1 stated that he/she had to lift R1 in other to clean R1, and then S2 came to finishing wiping and changing R1. S2 corroborated S1’s statement and confirmed to help S1 clean up R1. According to S2, there was nothing inappropriate that occurred. S2 indicated that R1 did not have any other interactions with R1 the remainder of the shift. The Sheriff’s spoke with R1’s relative who stated R1 indicated that no sexual intercourse had occurred. R1’s relative explained that the staff might have climbed on top of R1 and performed outercourse, but there was no penetration. The Department has investigation the above allegation. Based on interviews and record review the above allegation is unsubstantiated. An unsubstantiated finding indicates that although the allegation may have happened and/or is valid there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. No deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. This report was reviewed with Administrator, Josephine Arcilla and a copy of the report was provided. PAGE 2 OF 2.