Complaint·March 8, 2025

LPA Lee interviewed 2 out of 2 resident who stated that they have no concerns that the facility does not have adequate food supplies. Based on the interviews conducted during the investigation process LPA was unable to corroborate the allegations. The investigation revealed the preponderance of evidence standards have not been met; therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation(s)occurred. Per California Code of Regulations (CCRs) - Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 6, no deficiencies were cited. A copy of this report was provided. Exit interview. Moreover, in an interview with administrator facility staff has completed their required trainings and first aid/CPR; however, the documents were not in staff files during the visit. As a result, this allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is substantiated means that the allegations are valid because the preponderance of the standard has been met. Deficiency cited on the LIC 9099-D, per Title 22 Regulations. An exit interview was conducted with the administrator and a copy of this LIC 9099, LIC 9099-D page and appeal rights provided to facility.