Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

During site visit conducted on 02/11/2021, LPAs investigated allegations that a resident (R1) had been living in unsanitary conditions, including a dirty room, unclean bedding, and wet clothing. LPAs were unable to observe resident, who had locked him/herself in the bathroom. Room and bedding appeared to be clean and odorless. LPAs observed a chair being removed from the resident's room and moved to facility dumpster. Chair had a faint odor of urine that became detectable from approximately 3 inches away with visible stains. LPAs returned to the facility on 02/19/21 to interview and observe R1. R1 appeared to be clean. R1 was temporarily placed in another room while facility replaced the carpet in R1's room with laminate. R1's temporary room was odorless, and appeared clean. R1's bed was observed to not contain any stains or traces of uncleanliness. R1 was unable to answer LPAs questions. On 3/11/2021 LPA interviewed medical professional (MP4) responsible for caring for R1. MP4 stated that they have never observed R1's room or person to be unclean in a manner beyond what is normal nor reflecting neglect. MP4 stated that they have never detected an odor in R1's room, nor any stains on clothes or furniture. MP4 stated that R1 is resistant to care. MP4 further stated that R1 has incontinence. LPAs interviewed 2 facility cleaning staff members on 3/19/2021. 2 of 2 housekeeping staff indicated that R1's room is cleaned once a week as indicated on cleaning staff schedule. Housekeeping staff further stated that stains on chair have existed for an undetermined but long time. 18 out of 18 residents were observed to be clean and well groomed. LPAs observed 15 resident rooms, all were noted to be clean and odorless. LPAs interviewed 3 staff members; facility administrator (Admin), registered nurse (RN), and maintenance director (MD). RN and Admin stated that family members of hospice residents were allowed to visit once per week for one hour. RN and Admin deny any family members of hospice residents being denied entry to facility. Facility administrator provided LPAs with memo supplied to residents and resident family members stipulating visitation policy. RN was on duty on 2/7/2020 and denies that R1's clothing, diapers, or bedding were left soiled for extended period. RN stated that facility was aware of R1's incontinence and attend to R1 frequently. MD was interviewed in regards to carpet cleaning. MD stated that carpet cleaning was enacted whenever requested by housekeeping or care-giving staff. MD indicated that they were preparing to replace carpet in R1's room per family request. LPAs interviewed 1 resident also on hospice, resident stated that his/her child (F1) was permitted to visit regularly. LPAs contacted F1, who was visiting that day. F1 stated that they have never been denied visitation whenever they requested it. The Department has investigated the above allegations. Based on observations. interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the Department found that the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED . An unsubstantiated finding indicates that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegation did or did not occur. Report reviewed with Tami Ojwang, General Manager, and a copy of this report provided electronically for signature.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87411(a)Type A

    Facility personnel sufficiency and competence

    87411 Personnel Requirements - General(a): Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on records review and interviews, facility did not have sufficient staffing to meet resident's needs during COVID-19 outbreak. This posed an immediate risk to the personal rights of residents in care.

  • Personal assistance and care for required daily activities

    87464 Basic Services(f)(4): Personal assistance and care as needed by the resident... with those activities of daily living such as dressing, eating, bathing. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on records review and interviews, facility was unable to provide assistance and showers in a timely manner. This posed an immediate risk to the personal rights of the residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 19, 2021 inspection of SUNSHINE VILLA ASSISTED LIVING AND MEMORY CARE?

This was a complaint inspection of SUNSHINE VILLA ASSISTED LIVING AND MEMORY CARE on April 19, 2021. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to SUNSHINE VILLA ASSISTED LIVING AND MEMORY CARE on April 19, 2021?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.