Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

BROOKDALE SCOTTS VALLEYLicense 445294156
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

LPA Monter interviewed residents R1-R9. R1 stated the facility has missed giving him/her a shower. R1 stated when staff doesn’t arrive for his/her scheduled shower, he/she will contact staff, then staff will assist him/her. 2 Out of 9 residents interviewed (R3 & R8), stated they don’t need assistance with showering. 4 Out of 9 residents interviewed (R4-R7) stated they receive their showers, and the facility hasn’t missed giving his/her shower. Resident R2 and R9 were unavailable to be interviewed. On July 5, 2024 , the Department received a complaint alleging Staff do not safeguard resident's personal items. It has been alleged that resident’s laundry has been lost. On July 10, 2024, LPA Monter interviewed staff S1-S6. Staff S1 stated the facility has a schedule for laundry service and each resident has their own bins. S1 S2 S3 S5 stated they put the residents’ cloths in the washer, and note it on the board, with the resident’s room number to keep track of their cloths. S1 S2 S5 stated the residents’ cloths has not been lost. S3 S4 S6 stated if a resident reports something lost, then the facility will replace the lost item or reimburse the resident. LPA interviewed residents R1-R9. R1 stated the facility has lost some of his/her cloths but once he/she informs the staff, they find the missing clothing. 4 Out of 9 residents’ interview (R3, R5-R7) stated they have not had any clothing lost. Residents R4 and R8 stated they do not use the facility laundry service. Resident R2 and R9 were unavailable to be interviewed. Based on investigation, records reviewed, and interviews conducted, the Department found that the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED . An unsubstantiated finding indicates that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegations did or did not occur. This report was reviewed with Executive Director Alex Baisu and Valentine Mathangani, Health & Wellness Director III a copy of the report was provided. PAGE 2 OF 2. LPA Monter interviewed residents R1-R9. Resident R1 and R3-R8 stated the facility does have an outbreak of covid. Resident R1 and R3-R7, stated the dining room is currently closed and meals are being delivered to the resident’s room. Resident R4-R5, R9 stated the facility is offering residents masks. Resident R2 and R9 were unavailable to be interviewed. LPA Monter interviewed Witness W1. W1 stated there is currently a covid outbreak at the facility. W1 stated the dinning room is closed due to the covid outbreak. LPA Monter toured the facility. LPA observed the dining room as closed. LPA observed the facility delivering residents lunch to residents’ bedroom. LPA observed facility staff wearing masks. On July 5, 2024 , t he Department received a complaint alleging Staff handled resident in a rough manner. It has been alleged that resident R1 was pushed. On July 10, 2024, LPA Monter interviewed staff members S1-S6. 6 Out of 6 staff interviewed denied the allegation and stated staff members don’t push residents. 6 Out of 6 staff members interviewed stated staff did not push R1. LPA Monter interviewed residents R1-R9. R1 stated he/she has never been pushed by staff. Resident R3-R8 stated they have not seen staff pushing residents. Resident R2 and R9 were unavailable to be interviewed. LPA Monter interviewed Witness W1. W1 stated he/she has never seen staff handle residents roughly or seen staff push residents. On July 5, 2024 , the Department received a complaint alleging Staff do not treat resident with dignity or respect. It has been alleged R1 was left at the dinning room table for an extended period of time. PAGE 2 OF 3. On July 10, 2024, LPA Monter interviewed staff members S1-S6. Staff S1-S3, S5-S6, stated residents have not been left unattended in the dinning room for an extending period of time. S4 stated he/she has seen R1 left unattended. S4 stated staff don’t want to escort R1 because staff state they are going home. Staff S1-S6 stated residents are treated with dignity and respect. LPA Monter interviewed residents R1-R9. R1 stated he/she has never been left alone, unattended in the dinning room for an extending period. Residents R3-R8 stated they have not seen residents left unattended in the dining room for an extending period. Residents R1, R3-R8 stated they are treated with dignity and respect. Resident R2 and R9 were unavailable to be interviewed. The Department has completed the investigation of the above allegations. Based on interviews conducted and records review, the department has found that the above allegations we re UNFOUNDED , meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or are without a reasonable basis. This report was reviewed with Executive Director Alex Baisu and Valentine Mathangani, Health & Wellness Director III and a copy of the report was provided. PAGE 3 OF 3.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87625(b)(3)Type A

    (b) In addition to Section 87611, General Requirements for Allowable Health Conditions, the licensee shall be responsible for the following: (3) Ensuring that incontinent residents are kept clean and dry and that the facility remains free of odors from incontinence. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview, record review and observation the licensee did not ensure resident (R3) was left clean and dry as R3 was found in dirty double diapers which poses an immediate health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 2, 2024 inspection of BROOKDALE SCOTTS VALLEY?

This was a complaint inspection of BROOKDALE SCOTTS VALLEY on August 2, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to BROOKDALE SCOTTS VALLEY on August 2, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.