Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

SUNDIAL ASSISTED LIVINGLicense 4550029593 citations on this visit
3 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

During the investigation, it was reported that there were two residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) that were at the facility and diagnosed with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA), which is highly contagious. It was stated that Resident 1 was in the facility with MRSA during the month of April 2025. It was reported that Resident 2 was in the facility with MRSA during the month of June 2025. It was stated that initially, staff were not given the information or directive that residents had MRSA . Based on investigation observations, interviews, and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be Substantiated. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22), is cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Allegation: Staff do not ensure staff are properly trained. During the interview process, the Administrator, Wellness Services Director and several staff persons were interviewed. Documents were obtained to include Physicians Reports, Emergency Information, Appraisals and Needs, Admission Agreements, hospital notes, staff person names and contact numbers. During the investigation, it was reported that there were two residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) that were at the facility and diagnosed with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA). It was stated by several persons that the medication technicians and care providers were not provided with training regarding providing care and supervision with residents that have MRSA. It was reported that management gave a verbal instruction; however, no formal training. Training did not include documentation from an appropriately skilled professional stating what aspects of care will be delegated to facility staff responsible for the care and that the appropriately skilled professional will train those staff persons prior to delegating care. Based on investigation observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be Substantiated . California Code of Regulations, (Title 22), is cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Report Continued on additional LIC 9099-C Allegation: Staff do not ensure facility has adequate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) supplies. During the interview process, the Administrator, Wellness Services Director, and several staff persons were interviewed. Documents were obtained to include Physicians Reports, Emergency Information, Appraisals and Needs, Admission Agreements, hospital notes, staff person names and contact numbers. During the investigation, it was reported that there were two residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) that were at the facility and diagnosed with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA). Staff were advised to use gloves; however, were not told of the importance to use Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) to include gloves, mask, gown and foot booties. Based on investigation observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be Substantiated. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22), is cited on the attached LIC 9099D.

Citations

4 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87616(a)Type A

    87616(a) Exceptions for Health Condition - As specified in Section 87209, Program Flexibility, the licensee may submit a written exception request if he/she agrees that the resident has a prohibited and/or restrictive health condition but believes that the intent of the law can be met through alternative means. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records reviewed, the licensee/administrator did not follow the guidelines of the Prohibited Health Conditions. Licensee/administrator should have requested to have an exception in place. This poses an immediate risk to residents in care.

  • 87411(a)Type A

    Personnel Requirements, General - Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs… This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records reviewed, the licensee/administrator did not provide formal training to staff regarding Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA). This poses an immediate risk to residents in care.

  • 87468.2(a)(4)Type A

    Personal Rights - In addition to the rights listed in Section 87468.1, Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities, residents in privately operated residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency to meet their needs. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records reviewed, the licensee/administrator did not ensure that all staff were aware that residents had Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA), or other serious infection. This poses an immediate risk to residents in care.

  • 87470(b)(2)(A)Type A

    87470(b)(2)(A) - Infection Control Requirements - In addition to subsection (a), when one or more residents in the facility are diagnosed with a contagious disease, the following shall apply: All staff and volunteers providing direct care to a resident who has a contagious disease shall wear appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) to prevent exposure to infectious agents… This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records reviewed, the licensee/administrator did not ensure that staff were provided with all PPE supplies during a time when a resident had MRSA. This poses an immediate risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 17, 2025 inspection of SUNDIAL ASSISTED LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of SUNDIAL ASSISTED LIVING on July 17, 2025. 3 citations were issued: 3 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to SUNDIAL ASSISTED LIVING on July 17, 2025?

Yes, 3 citations were issued (3 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "87616(a) Exceptions for Health Condition - As specified in Section 87209, Program Flexibility, the licensee may submit a..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.