Skip to main content
ReadyRule homepageReadyRule

Inspection visit

complaint

VACAVILLE MEMORY CARELicense 4868036451 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

At approximately 9:45AM, Licensing Program Analyst's (LPA's) Caitlynn Felias and Chris Arnhold arrived at this facility to conduct an investigation into the above allegations. LPA's met with Resident Services Director Mae Mora, toured the facility, interviewed staff and reviewed records. Based on records reviewed, staff records do not contain evidence of required annual training for dementia specific training. LPA's reviewed staff training documentation and found the documented training did not meet the requirements of regulation. Based on the Departments investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiencies are cited from the California Code of Regulations (CCRs), and/or the Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the cited deficiency(ies), on or before the Plan of Correction (POC) due date, may result in a civil penalty assessment. This report was reviewed with Mae Mora and Appeal rights were given.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.312(d)Type A

    1569.312(d) Being aware of the resident's general whereabouts, although the resident may travel independently in the community. This requirement is not met as evidenced by:Based on interviews conducted, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above and did not ensure that staff knew the general whereabouts of R1. It was reported that R1 left the facility unassisted and without staff knowledge. A search was conducted and R1 was found unharmed. This poses an immediate risk to the health and safety of residents in care.

  • 87707(a)(2)Type B

    Direct care staff shall complete at least eight hours of in-service training on the subject of serving residents with dementia...and in each succeeding 12-month period. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on records reviewed, Licensee did not have at least 8 hours of documented in-service training for staff. This poses a potential Health, Safety or personal rights risk to residents.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the July 6, 2022 inspection of VACAVILLE MEMORY CARE?

This was a complaint inspection of VACAVILLE MEMORY CARE on July 6, 2022. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to VACAVILLE MEMORY CARE on July 6, 2022?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "1569.312(d) Being aware of the resident's general whereabouts, although the resident may travel independently in the com..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.