Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

VACAVILLE MEMORY CARELicense 486803645
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Continued from LIC9099 LPA was informed that facility staff will help residents eat through verbal prompting or by guiding the utensil to a resident's mouth. Per interviews, there are 4 residents that require help with feeding. Review of resident files indicated that none of these residents were the resident shown in the photograph. Interviews conducted also indicated that they have not observed residents to be force fed by staff. During visit conducted on 02/20/2025, LPA observed lunch being served to the residents. LPA observed that some residents were being verbally prompted to eat. LPA did not observe any resident being hand-fed but was informed that some of the residents were sleeping and would be provided their meal when they woke up. Based on document review, interviews conducted, and observations made, this allegation is Unsubstantiated . A finding that the complaint allegation is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. No Deficiencies Cited during visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report discussed and provided to Executive Director/Administrator. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87466Type A

    87466 Observation of the Resident: Licensee shall ensure...residents are regularly observed for changes...& that appropriate assistance is provided...Licensee shall ensure...changes are documented & brought to the attention of the resident's physician & responsible person, if any. Requirement was not met as evidenced by: based on interviews, records & observations, Licensee did not ensure that facility staff responded appropriately to observations of R1's wound resulting in an unstageable injury. This is an immediate health & safety risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the February 20, 2025 inspection of VACAVILLE MEMORY CARE?

This was a complaint inspection of VACAVILLE MEMORY CARE on February 20, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to VACAVILLE MEMORY CARE on February 20, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.