Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

VACAVILLE MEMORY CARELicense 486803645
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Continued from LIC9099C LPAs Felias and Deniz conducted an investigation into the allegation of “Licensee using an Admission Agreement that is not lawful” specifically related to Title 42 regulation section 486.15(a)(3) which states “42 CFR 483.15(a)(3), the facility must not request or require a third party guarantee of payment to the facility as a condition of admission or expedited admission, or continued stay in the facility. However, the facility may request and require a resident representative who has legal access to a resident's income or resources available to pay for facility care to sign a contract, without incurring personal financial liability, to provide facility payment from the resident's income or resources.” Vacaville Senior Living is a Community Care Licensed facility, and the oversight is under Title 22 Regulations not Title 42. In reviewing Title 22 regulations there is not language that coincides with the section cited above. This allegation is Unfounded . A finding that the complaint is Unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. No Deficiencies Cited during visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report discussed and provided to Executive Director. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents.

Citations

4 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87202(a)Type A

    87202 Fire Clearance (a) All facilities shall maintain a fire clearance approved by the city, county, or city and county fire department, or district providing fire protection services, or the State Fire Marshal...this requirement was not met as evidenced by: based on observsations made, Licensee did not comply with the section cited above and ensure that all facility exits were unobstructed in the event of emergency. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87411(a)Type A

    87411 Personnel Requirements – General(a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs...This requirement was not met as evidenced by: based on interviews conducted and document review, Licensee did not comply with the section cited above and ensure that all 5 homes at facility had adequate staffing to meet resident care needs. Licensee has at least 6 residents that require two staff member assistance. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87468.2(a)(1)Type A

    87468.2Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities(a) In addition to the rights listed in Section 87468.1...(1)To have a reasonable level of personal privacy accommodations...personal care & assistance...use of the Internet...this requirement was not met as evidenced by: based on interviews conducted & document review, Licensee did not comply with the section cited above & Residents did not have signed social media consent forms prior to being on social media. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87208(a)Type B

    87208 Plan of Operation (a) Each facility shall have and maintain a current, written definitive plan of operation...plan & related materials shall be on file in the facility & shall be submitted to the licensing agency with the license application. Any significant changes...which would affect the services to residents shall be submitted...for approval. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Licensee failed to submit Admissions Agreement for review to ensure changes were not made that required approval by CCL. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 23, 2025 inspection of VACAVILLE MEMORY CARE?

This was a complaint inspection of VACAVILLE MEMORY CARE on April 23, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to VACAVILLE MEMORY CARE on April 23, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.