Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

VACAVILLE MEMORY CARELicense 486803645
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Continued from LIC9099 page... During the incident, staff contacted 911 immediately, and three (3) caregivers followed the resident at a safe distance until emergency responders arrived. The second incident occurred on 11/24/2025. Documentation indicates that staff were closely monitoring the resident due to known exit-seeking behavior. Staff were unable to redirect the resident at the main gate and contacted paramedics for assistance. During both incidents, staff maintained visual contact with the resident and continued to follow at a safe distance. LPA conducted interviews with the Executive Director and the resident’s spouse; however, there was insufficient evidence to determine that the resident was left unsupervised for an extended period of time. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the facility followed its established protocols and remained in compliance with Title 22 regulations; therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated . A finding that the complaint allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report discussed and provided to Executive Director. Signature on form confirms receipt of documents.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87468.1(a)(3)Type B

    87468.1(a)(3) Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities: (a)(3) To be free from punishment,humiliation, intimidation, abuse, or other actions of a punitive nature, such as withholding residents’...This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted, records reviewed, and observations made, the facility failed to ensure resident’s rights and protection from abuse. This poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 30, 2026 inspection of VACAVILLE MEMORY CARE?

This was a complaint inspection of VACAVILLE MEMORY CARE on March 30, 2026. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to VACAVILLE MEMORY CARE on March 30, 2026?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.