Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Follow-up

VILLAGE AT RANCHO SOLANO ASSISTED LIVING, THELicense 4868038065 citations on this visit
5 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Fernandes-Goes arrived unannounced with the purpose of closing a complaint investigation. During subsequent complaint investigation LPA learned that there are related deficiencies observed during the visit. LPA met with Blaine Lyons - Acting Executive Director. Following item were observed during investigation visits: Department has learned after alarm records review that facility alarm system on 2/17/2022 show that from 100 % of calls 22 % were answered in a time frame of 10 to 29 min and 9.6 % of calls took 30 min to 1 hr 18 min to be answered. Facility on 2/17/2022 had according to records provided by facility 102 Assisted Living residents'. Acting Executive Director email stated that facility had 1 medication technician and 3 agency care staff. However, facility records show that there were only 3 staff on NOC shift counting medication technician and after 4 AM only one staff on shift. (copy of records on file) Records show that call bell alarms in Assisted Living were not answered in a timely matter to ensure that residents' needs were meet. (see LIC 809-D) During visit to facility on 8/1/2022 Department reviewed residents' and staff files and learned that 4 out of 4 residents' files have no updated care plan as required by Title 22 Regulations. Residents R1 & R2 have a diagnosis of dementia and care plans dated 7/25 and 3/16/2021 while residents R3 no care plan found – only has a pre-assessment which dates 10/12/2020 & R4 has a care plan in progress that dated 11/9/2018. In addition, resident R4 has a physical assessment (LIC 602) dated 3/31/2021 however; it is not signed. (see LIC 809-D) Continued 809-C Regarding staff files review, 3 out of 3 staff don’t have proof of enough training according to Health & Safety Code requirements. Staff S1 was hired on 3/2/2021 with no proof of medication training under this facility, CPR, and/or 1 st Aid – only documentation is a Med Tech training from 2016 under facility Nazareth Fairfield. Staff S2 was hired on 11/25/2020 and has proof of a total of 11.5 hours training between 11/26/2020 and 9/29/2021, no proof of CPR and/or 1 st Aid certification. Staff S3 has no proof of training or file at facility. (see LIC 809-D) Timecard for staff S3 was submitted to the Department, however; facility has no file and staff is not associated to the facility. According with a week timecard submitted staff S3 worked on 2/13/2022 and 2/17/2022. (see LIC 809-D, Civil Penalties) In addition, none of the staff mentioned above has criminal record statement on file (see LIC 809-D), and staff names from agency that were provided to the Department by Acting Executive Director had only first names. Department wasn’t able to review fingerprint clearance, association, and/or training for these individuals. Immediate Civil Penalties are being assessed in the amount of $200 due to staff not being associated to the facility. *****Total Civil Penalties issued today in the amount of $200.00. Appeal of Rights Given. The following deficiencies were observed (see LIC 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 of California Regulation. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12 month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted and appeal of rights provided.

Citations

5 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.618(b)(3)Type B

    1569.618 (b)(3)Ensure that at least 1 staff member who has cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training & first aid training is on duty & on the premises at all times.This requirement isn't met as evidenced by: Based on staff file review & interviews 3 out of3 staff file had no proof of 1st Aid and on 2/17/22 there were no staff w/ CPR on premises as per 8/11/22 visit and records requested on email which poses a potential health, safety, & personal rights risk to residents in care.

  • 1569.625Type B

    §1569.625 Staff training; legislative findings…This requirement isn't met as evidenced by:Based on records review & interviews,licensee didn't comply w/section cited above in 3 out of 3 staff training which poses a potential health, safety,& personal risk to residents in care.During visit on 8/11 & email follow up, facility wasn't able to provide sufficient initial & on going proof of training for staff S1&S2 and no proof of training for S3.

  • 87355Type A

    87355 Criminal Record Clearance.This requirement isnt met as evidenced by: Based on records reviewed facility didn't comply w/section above on 1 out of 3 staff fingerprint clearance & staff association before providing care to residents which poses an immediate health, safety, & personal rights risk to residents in care.CCLD reviewedtimecards provided by facility & learned that staff S3 isnt associated to facility.Staff S3 worked 2 days between 2/13 & 2/17/22.

  • 87412Type B

    87412 Personnel Records:This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on records reviewed & interview facility didn't comply w/section above on 3 out of 3 staff files which poses a potential safety risk to residents in care. During visit on 8/11/22 LPA requested to review 2 staff files S1, S2, S3 based on timecards provide by facility. Facility staff files for S1 & S2 only contained resume & training. S3 had no file available.

  • 87463(c)Type B

    87463(c) Reappraisals...once every 12 months...as specified in Section 87467.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation,interview, and record review, facility did not comply with the section cited above in 4 out of 4 residents' reappraisals which poses a potential health,safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.Dept learned that residents R1,2,3,4 have no reappraisal or they are over 12 months.(see copies)

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the September 16, 2022 inspection of VILLAGE AT RANCHO SOLANO ASSISTED LIVING, THE?

This was a other inspection of VILLAGE AT RANCHO SOLANO ASSISTED LIVING, THE on September 16, 2022. 5 citations were issued: 1 Type A (serious) and 4 Type B.

Were any citations issued to VILLAGE AT RANCHO SOLANO ASSISTED LIVING, THE on September 16, 2022?

Yes, 5 citations were issued (1 Type A, 4 Type B). The first citation was for: "1569.618 (b)(3)Ensure that at least 1 staff member who has cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training & first aid trai..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.