Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Continued from LIC9099... Further interview with RDN indicated that the facility has attempted multiple times to contact the hospital and have not received any further information regarding R1. Interview with witness (W1) indicated they had observed R1 ambulating and transferring on their own without any issues. Interview with Regional Director of Operations (RDO) indicated that no eviction notice had been issued and the facility would take R1 back after conducting a thorough reassessment. Further interviews with RDO indicated that reassessments with R1 had been attempted, however, the facility and responsible party could not agree upon a date. RDO indicated that R1’s room had been cleaned out by their responsible party without informing the facility. Review of emails correspondence indicated that attempts had been made by both the facility and responsible party to conduct a reassessment with all parties present, however, dates could not be made or were cancelled by either the facility or the responsible party. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated . No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted with Health and Wellness Director, whose signature on form confirms receipt.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87465(a)(2)Type A

    87465(a)(2) The licensee shall provide assistance in meeting necessary medical and dental needs...This requirement not met by licensee as evidenced by: Resident (R1) did not receive adequate body checks that resulted in partial amputation of their big toe from an ulcer which poses/posed an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 12, 2026 inspection of VILLAGE AT RANCHO SOLANO ASSISTED LIVING, THE?

This was a complaint inspection of VILLAGE AT RANCHO SOLANO ASSISTED LIVING, THE on March 12, 2026. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to VILLAGE AT RANCHO SOLANO ASSISTED LIVING, THE on March 12, 2026?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.