Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

COGIR OF VALLEJO HILLSLicense 4868038082 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Continue report from LIC9099 In addition it was reported the call button pendant system was not working properly as staff were not always responding timely because the system at times would not go to the staff to respond. It was corroborated staff were not alerted when R1 pressed their pendant call button for assistance. Records show the call button was activated, but staff did not hear it. It was also alleged facility staff did not answer residents' calls in a timely manner in that when residents activate their call buttons during noc shift, a signal is sent to the front desk, however, the front desk was no longer staffed during the noc shift so no one heard it. It was also reported the noc shift staff wear pagers, however the residents’ calls do not go from the front desk to the pagers. It was corroborated resident R1 used their call button as they needed their PRN medication, staff were not responding and R1 had to leave their room to locate staff. Records show it has taken staff up to 32 minutes to respond to a residents call for assistance. Administrator expressed Issues with the residents pendant calls have also been corrected and staff are alerted when a resident requires assistance and push their call button as the phones are working properly. Based on the information received and records gathered, both allegations for, Facility's signal system is not working properly and Facility staff did not answer residents' calls in a timely manner are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is SUBSTANTIATED means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. The following deficiencies were observed (see LIC 9099D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 of California Regulation. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12 month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted and appeal of rights provided.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.269(a)(6)Type A

    1569.269(a)(6)Enumerated rights; severability(a)Residents of residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following rights: (6)To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency to meet their needs. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on Investigation and records reviewed, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not ensuring that residents call buttons were working properly and reaching staff when they required assistance. R1 waited about 32 minutes & then left their room to search for staff to provide them with needed medication. This is an immediate risk to the health & safety of residents in care.

  • 87303(i)(1)(B)Type B

    87303(i)(1)(B)Maintenance and Operation (i)Facilities shall have signal systems which shall meet the following criteria: (1)All facilities licensed for 16 or more and all residential facilities having separate floors or buildings shall have a signal system which shall: (B)Transmit a visual and/or auditory signal to a central staffed location or produce an auditory signal at the living unit loud enough to summon staff. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on statements received, it was corroborated that there was an issue with the phones not working properly and staff were not properly alerted when they needed to open the front door after hours and pendant calls were not always transmitting a signal to staff. This is a potential risk to the health and safety of residents in care.

    Read full inspector narrative

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the March 11, 2024 inspection of COGIR OF VALLEJO HILLS?

This was a complaint inspection of COGIR OF VALLEJO HILLS on March 11, 2024. 2 citations were issued: 1 Type A (serious) and 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to COGIR OF VALLEJO HILLS on March 11, 2024?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (1 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "1569.269(a)(6)Enumerated rights; severability(a)Residents of residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all ..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.