Skip to main content
ReadyRule homepageReadyRule

Inspection visit

Follow-up

MAGNOLIA COURTLicense 486803822
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On 6/20/2024, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA’s) Tobola & Mutialu arrived unannounced for the purpose of a Case Management to follow up on Administrator qualifications and were greeted by Acting Administrator, Mike Chatman (AA) and Resident Service Director, Grace Montemayor. The facility is currently in the process of assigning a designated Administrator for the care facility. AA provided proof of administrator re-certification from the Community Care Licensing Administrator Portal. In addition, AA stated that the Licensee is determining the final candidate and will provide LPA's with a time frame on when the Administrator will begin position. The Licensee and AA understand that facility must have active qualified Administrator and that the current status of the facility poses a potential health & safety risk as the previous Administrator had been removed from the facility as of May 16, 2024. No deficiencies cited.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 1569.625(b)(1)Type B

    1569.625(b)(1) A staff member shall complete 20 hours, including six hours specific to dementia care, as required by subdivision (a) of Section 1569.626 and four hours specific to postural supports, restricted health conditions, and hospice care, as required by subdivision (a) of Section 1569.696, before working independently with residents. This was not met as evidence by:**Based upon review of staff records it was found that 12 caregiving staff had received hoyer lift training on 6/13/2024, after resident (R1) had already been residing in the facility for several months requiring hoyer lift assistance. This serves as a potential health & safety risk

  • 87411(a)Type A

    87411(a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers & competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs…This requirement has not been met as evidence by:**Based on records review of alarm response system and interivews with multiple staff Administrator did not ensure that staff on duty responded in a timely manner to call system to assist residents (R2 & R3) in care. Call bell response times were between 1-3 hours, which poses an immediate risk to the health and safety of residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the June 20, 2024 inspection of MAGNOLIA COURT?

This was a other inspection of MAGNOLIA COURT on June 20, 2024. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to MAGNOLIA COURT on June 20, 2024?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.