Complaint·March 10, 2023

Continued from LIC9099 Per interview with Administrator, they did not issue a 30-day eviction and instead had resident re-evaluated by their doctor and increased staff supervision. Regulation indicates that if a resident does not follow general policies of the facility, they “may” be evicted. Resident is not an appropriate placement – Complainant alleges that due to the noted resident’s behavior, they are not an appropriate placement. Per interview with Administrator, the identified resident was evaluated prior to moving in and Administrator determined they were appropriate based on their assessment. Per LPA review of the physician’s report dated 12/2022, the resident did not have any inappropriate behaviors. Additionally, inappropriate behaviors were not noted on the Pre-Placement Appraisal conducted 12/2022. Per file review, after resident moved into the facility and began to exhibit additional behaviors, the Administrator conducted a reassessment and had resident reassessed by their doctor. Following the reassessment, the Administrator determined that they were able to continue meeting the resident's needs. Staff are not providing adequate supervision – Complainant alleges that the facility is not providing adequate supervision which resulted in a resident going into another resident’s room without any clothes on. Review of pre-placement appraisal and appraisal, resident did not require one to one supervision. Per interviews, once resident was observed in another resident’s room without clothes on, the facility increased supervision and installed a motion detector to alert staff. A finding that the complaint allegations that Licensee is not enforcing house rules, Resident is not an appropriate placement and Staff are not providing adequate supervision were unsubstantiated meaning that although the allegations may have happened there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the allegations occurred. No deficiencies cited.