Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

CLEARWATER AT SONOMA HILLSLicense 496803860
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

R1 signed their admission agreement, after a review of the contract with the facility's staff, prior to moving into the facility. The facility requires admission contracts/agreements be reviewed, completed, and signed by resident (s), legal representative or a responsible party, prior to being allowed to move in to the facility unit, including moving personal belongings into the facility. R1 paid a fee of $8000 to hold a unit, the holding fee was equal to the required community fee, which is paid upon move-in along with monthly rent, and care fees. Per review of records, the holding fee paid by R1's finances, became the required community fee, upon R1's signing of the admission agreement/contract. If R1 had decided to not sign a contract and enter the facility as a resident, the holding fee would have been refunded per facility policy. R1's records are confidential, and the records are available to the resident, who is responsible for themselves and/or the legal responsible party (s). The resident responsible for themselves, may give their written consent that "another party" may be provided their confidential records. Until a written consent is provided by the resident/R1 the facility will maintain resident R1's records private and confidential from other parties. Per investigation, there was differing information obtained regarding the allegations; There was no information obtained to support violations had occurred regarding the allegations of "staff misrepresented financial terms under resident's admission agreement, staff used coercive practices to influence resident's admission decisions, staff did not allow resident’s representative access to resident records." Based on the interviews, record/document reviews, and related information obtained during the investigation, the allegations are Unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview was conducted with the Executive Director James Homer.

Citations

No citations recorded on this visit

The inspector found no violations of California child care regulations during this visit.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 8, 2026 inspection of CLEARWATER AT SONOMA HILLS?

This was a complaint inspection of CLEARWATER AT SONOMA HILLS on January 8, 2026. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to CLEARWATER AT SONOMA HILLS on January 8, 2026?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.