Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

ETERNITY CARE HOMELicense 502700438
Clean visit · 0 citations

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Based on records reviewed, interviews with staff, reporting party, and residents in care, on the information provided, it was unclear if licensee does not ensure facility staff is adequately staffed to meet residents needs resulting in unwitnessed falls, therefore the allegation was deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. Facility staff are not meeting residents toileting needs- LPA Lund reviewed facility records, interviewed staff, reporting party, and residents in care. Based on records reviewed, interviews with staff, reporting party, and residents in care. Resident (R1) had monthly bowl movement records from 7/11/2024 through 10/15/2024. The reports stated when R1 had a bowl movement facility would change R1 depends. Staff interviewed stated that R1 would get their attention when needed to use the restroom. LPA Lund reviewed facility staffing schedule’s from 7/1/2024 through 10/31/2024 revealed two staff on duty consistently residents in care that include staff for the night. LPA Lund reviewed Samaritan Home Health report. R1 was a patient in-home starting on 8/16/2024 through 10/10/2024. R1 had a bowl movement and stated to Samaritan Home staff facility caregivers would change undergarment (Depends) per R1 routine with facility caregivers. Based on records reviewed, interviews with staff, reporting party, and residents in care, on the information provided, it was unclear if facility staff are not meeting residents toileting needs, therefore the allegation was deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED Facility staff left resident in urine soaked clothing for an extended period of time- LPA Lund reviewed facility records, interviewed staff, reporting party, and residents in care. Based on records reviewed, interviews with staff, reporting party, and residents in care. Staff interviewed stated that R1 would get their attention when needed to use the restroom. LPA Lund reviewed facility staffing schedule’s from 7/1/2024 through 10/31/2024 revealed two staff on duty consistently residents in care that include staff for the night. LPA Lund reviewed Samaritan Home Health report. R1 was a patient in-home starting on 8/16/2024 through 10/10/2024. R1 had a bowl movement and stated to Samaritan Home staff facility caregivers would change undergarment (Depends) per R1 routine with facility caregivers. Based on records reviewed, interviews with staff, reporting party, and residents in care, on the information provided, it was unclear if facility staff left resident in urine soaked clothing for an extended period of time, therefore the allegation was deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. Facility staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident- LPA Lund reviewed facility records, interviewed staff, reporting party, and residents in care. Based on records reviewed, interviews with staff, reporting party, and residents in care. Resident (R1) moved into the facility on 7/11/2024 and moved out on 10/15/2024. LPA Lund reviewed case notes for R1 which stated R1 had two falls during R1 stay at the facility. Care notes reviewed indicate that R1 fell 10/7/24 and it was addressed by staff. Staff (S1) stated R1 refused emergency help, and first aid was applied. 10/15/2024 R1 fell and refused emergency help. That same morning R1 son came, and paramedics were called. LPA Lund reviewed Samaritan Home Health report which states R1 had many medical conditions including chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure and type 2 diabetes. Based on records reviewed, interviews with staff, reporting party, and residents in care, on the information provided, it was unclear if facility staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident, therefore the allegation was deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. As a result of this investigation, this Department finds the allegation to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A complaint allegation finding of Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview conducted and report left.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87211(a)(1)(B)Type B

    written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence of any of the events specified in (A) through (D) below….. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Community Care Licensing didn’t receive UIR for the incident on 10/15/2024. This poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the April 7, 2025 inspection of ETERNITY CARE HOME?

This was a complaint inspection of ETERNITY CARE HOME on April 7, 2025. The inspection found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.

Were any citations issued to ETERNITY CARE HOME on April 7, 2025?

No citations were issued during this inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations.

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.