Skip to main content
ReadyRule homepageReadyRule

Inspection visit

complaint

PARK VISALIA ASSISTED LIVINGLicense 5472088091 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

On 12/10/2021, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Yang arrived unannounced to deliver complaint findings on the above allegation. LPA introduced self, stated the purpose of the visit, and met with Administrator Martin Vale. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility with Administrator. During the facility tour, LPA observed S1 not wearing face covering in facility kitchen. All staff in facility observed to be wearing face covering during the tour. Based on observation, the facility failed to protect the personal rights of clients in care to receive safe and healthful accommodations and engaged in conduct inimical to the health, welfare, and safety of clients in care in that 1 out 2 kitchen staff were observed to be not wearing facial covering in violation of official government orders requiring the wearing of face coverings while working under specified conditions. Therefore, the above allegation are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. A deficiency is being cited in accordance with the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8. An exit interview was conducted and a Plan of Correction was reviewed and developed with Administrator. As a COVID-19 precautionary measure, a copy of this report and Appeal rights will be provided via email. Report signed on-site.

Citations

1 citation recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87468.1(a)(2)Type B

    87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a)(2): Residents…shall have all of the following personal rights:(2) To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, the facility did not ensure staff are wearing facial coverings as mandated when it was observed that 1 out of 2 kitchen staff were not wearing facial coverings during the lunch period. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the December 10, 2021 inspection of PARK VISALIA ASSISTED LIVING?

This was a complaint inspection of PARK VISALIA ASSISTED LIVING on December 10, 2021. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to PARK VISALIA ASSISTED LIVING on December 10, 2021?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a)(2): Residents…shall have all of the following personal rights..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.