Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Follow-up on corrections

SKYLINE PLACE SENIOR LIVINGLicense 5527013051 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Triel Lindstrom and Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation. However, during that investigation, LPAs Lindstrom and Moleski observed an unrelated deficiency. A resident of this facility (R1) left to walk their dog on or around the morning of Saturday, August 23, 2025, according to facility administrator Valarie Pais. R1 was discovered at the bottom of a steep hillside on the evening of Sunday, August 24, 2025, according to the Tuolumne County Sheriff’s Office, which led search and rescue efforts. LPAs Lindstrom and Moleski reviewed R1’s service plan, dated November 22, 2024. The service plan indicates that R1 had a “history of wandering outside the community,” and that “health and safety may be jeopardized.” LPAs Lindstrom and Moleski reviewed R1’s LIC 602, which was signed by a physician on January 6, 2025. The LIC 602 does not indicate that R1 had a history of wandering behaviors. However, the actual exam of R1 took place on September 24, 2024, according to the LIC 602, which is before the aforementioned service plan identified a significant change in R1’s behavioral expressions. LPA Moleski asked Pais if R1’s physician was notified of the behaviors noted in the service plan. Pais said she was not aware of any such notification, and said that resident’s physicians should be notified if there is a significant change in condition. LPA Moleski spoke with the facility’s resident care director (S1), who had modified the service plan as of April 15, 2025. S1 said they were not aware of any such behavioral expressions. S1 said that R1’s physician should have been notified in the event that these behavioral expressions were identified. [continued on 809-C] LPAs Moleski and Lindstrom provided Pais an opportunity to acquire documentation showing that R1's physician was notified. Pais was unable to provide such documentation during this visit. 22 CCR Section 87755 states that " the licensing agency shall have the authority to inspect, audit, and copy resident or facility records upon demand during normal business hours. " 22 CCR Section 87463(e) states that “the licensee shall immediately, or as soon as reasonably possible, bring any significant change in condition … to the attention of the appropriate licensed medical professional … documentation of such communication shall be added to the resident’s record…” This facility is hereby cited per 22 CCR Section 87463(e). An exit interview was held with Pais. Appeal rights and a copy of this report were left with Pais.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87705(e)(5)Type A

    “Facility staff shall ensure the continued safety of residents if they wander away from the facility without violating Sections 87468.1, Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities and Section 87468.2, Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities.” This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, facility staff were aware of previous wandering behaviors which jeopardized the health and safety of the resident, yet did not ensure the resident’s safety during an episode of wandering behavior, which poses an immediate health, safety, and/or personal rights risk.

  • 87463(e)Type B

    “The licensee shall immediately, or as soon as reasonably possible, bring any significant change in condition, as defined in Section 87101, Definitions, to the attention of the appropriate licensed medical professional and if applicable, other specialized care provider. Documentation of such communication shall be added to the resident's record and shall include: …” This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, no documentation exists to suggest that a significant change in condition, documented on R1’s service plan dated to November 2024, was communicated to R1’s physician.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the August 27, 2025 inspection of SKYLINE PLACE SENIOR LIVING?

This was a other inspection of SKYLINE PLACE SENIOR LIVING on August 27, 2025. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to SKYLINE PLACE SENIOR LIVING on August 27, 2025?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "“Facility staff shall ensure the continued safety of residents if they wander away from the facility without violating S..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.