Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

ATRIA HILLCRESTLicense 5658003661 citation on this visit
1 citation recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

It was alleged that staff are prohibited from assisting residents with feeding, including Resident #1 (R1) and Resident #2 (R2) who reside in the facility’s memory care unit and are receiving hospice care services. During the initial complaint visit, LPA interviewed multiple staff, Administrator and Corporate office representative. All employees interviewed indicated this facility does not assist residents with feeding. ED indicated all families are aware of the Atria policy and the facility’s Admission Agreement indicates Atria does not provide these services. Review of Acceptance and Retention criteria revealed that residents “must have the ability to feed him or herself.” LPA reviewed the Admission Agreement signed by R1’s representative, which does include the attachment referenced, however, the Admission Agreement that was submitted to Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) upon licensure does not include this Attachment nor any policy indicating residents must be able to feed themselves. LPA confirmed with ED that the facility’s Admission Agreement and current related policies have not been sent to nor approved by CCLD. Interview with ED and corporate representative revealed that the facility is not staffed to assist with feeding residents and residents in the facility need to be able to feed themselves or have a private caregiver or family member to assist with resident’s feeding. ED reiterated that facility staff do not assist residents with feeding. Corporate representative stated that if a resident declines and requires any of the services Atria does not offer, as outlined in the Acceptance and Retention Criteria (such as puree food, thickened liquids, or feeding assistance) that the facility staff may assist the resident for up to 30 days while an eviction notice is served to the resident. However, interviews conducted during the initial complaint visit revealed that staff have been instructed not to assist with feeding, as it is against policy. None of the care staff interviewed mentioned they are able to assist with feeding temporarily while a resident is relocated. Instead, all care staff interviewed stated they have been instructed that assisting residents with feeding is against policy. As far as R1, ED stated that R1 passed away under hospice care, but near the end R1 had a private companion to assist in feeding R1. Record review revealed that in a fax dated 09/20/2024, facility staff communicated to R1’s hospice care provider “[R1] needs to be fed by care staff or else [R1] won’t eat.” However, interview revealed care staff are not allowed to assist residents with feeding. In the case of R2, ED stated that R2’s family member is present for 2 (two) meals a day 6 (six) days a week and when R2’s family member isn’t present, R2 will still pick at their food. Interview with R2’s family member revealed that they assume the staff are spoon feeding R2 when the family member is not present at the facility. R2’s family member appeared to be unaware of Atria’s policy related to feeding. Staff did state R2 will sometimes feed Report Continued on LIC 9099-C themselves if the food is placed in their hand, but staff have been reminded this is not allowed per Atria policy. Review of Atria plan of operation revealed that “the community must provide assistance and care for the resident in those activities of daily living which the resident is unable to do for himself/herself…The community must provide this assistance and cannot delegate this care to family members, private duty personnel, outside agencies, etc.,” which is consistent with Title 22 Regulation. Both ED and corporate representative interviews revealed the facility is delegating ADL care such as feeding to private duty aides and family members, contrary to the facility policy. ED also stated that per ED's conversation with corporate, that changes to both the Admission Agreement and facility’s policies related to feeding and care services offered were not submitted to CCLD for approval. Based on interview and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the allegation “staff are not assisting residents with feeding” is deemed SUBSTANTIATED at this time. Pursuant to Title 22, California Code of Regulations and/or CA Health and Safety Code, the following deficiency is cited (refer to LIC9099-D). Exit interview conducted, appeal rights discussed, and a copy of this report was provided.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87208(a)Type B

    87208 (a) The licensee shall have and maintain a current, written definitive plan of operation for the facility...significant changes in the plan of operation which would affect the services to residents shall be submitted to the licensing agency for approval...This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the facility has changed it's policies and Admission Agreement as it relates to care services offered to residents, however no approval was obtained from the Department, which poses a potential health and personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87463(a)Type B

    87463 Reappraisals (a) The pre-admission appraisal...shall be updated in writing as frequently as necessary...to note significant changes in condition...and to keep the appraisal accurate...updated pre-admission appraisal shall be referred to as reappraisalThis requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, R1 had a change of condition on or around 12/02/2024 (hospitalization, UTI, catheter, medication change and increased anxiety/depression) however, the facility did not conduct a reappraisal, which posed a potential health risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the May 22, 2025 inspection of ATRIA HILLCREST?

This was a complaint inspection of ATRIA HILLCREST on May 22, 2025. 1 citation were issued: 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to ATRIA HILLCREST on May 22, 2025?

Yes, 1 citation was issued (0 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "87208 (a) The licensee shall have and maintain a current, written definitive plan of operation for the facility...signif..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.