Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

ROYAL OAKS HOME CARELicense 5658018512 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Regarding the allegations that staff caused a resident (R1) to fall, staff physically restrained resident, and staff prevented resident from leaving the facility, the complainant’s concern was that inappropriate behavior by staff, which included physically restraining R1 in an effort to prevent them from exiting the facility, caused R1 to fall. During the interviews conducted on 7/21/2022, S1 stated that on 7/7/2022, R1 attempted to elope from the facility through the garage as R1 wanted additional cigarettes and to return home. S1 stated they prevented R1 from leaving the facility by blocking R1, but S1 insisted to the LPA they did not put their hands on R1. S1 stated they were holding a plate of food at the time and R1 slapped the plate of food out of S1’s hand. S1 stated that the action of hitting the plate caused R1 to lose their balance and fall back into some boxes in the garage. During LPA’s interview with R1, they gave substantively the same statement. However, during the LPA’s interviews with witnesses and review of police records, it was found that R1 and S1 gave different statements to the police. On 7/7/2022, S1 told the police that they grabbed R1’s wrists to prevent R1 from leaving the facility. While holding R1’s wrists, S1 walked R1 backward into the garage but R1 lost their balance and fell. R1’s statement to the police on 7/7/2022 indicated S1 grabbed R1 by the shoulder and pushed r1 down. The police did not find any evidence of assault, but they did indicate to the administrator the staff should have a hands-off approach to addressing R1’s elopement attempts. Although the above noted allegations were found unsubstantiated during the initial complaint visit on 7/21/2022, after further review of documents and additional witness interviews, the above noted allegations are deemed SUBSTANTIATED at this time. Pursuant to Title 22 CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 9099-D). Exit interview conducted. Today's report and appeal rights were discussed and emailed.

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87615(a)(2)Type A

    87615 Prohibited Health Conditions(a) Persons who require health services for or have a health condition including, but not limited to, those specified below shall not be admitted or retained in a residential care facility for the elderly:(2) Gastrostomy tubes. Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, as R1 has a g-tube, which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87468.1(a)(3)Type B

    87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (3) To be free from punishment, humiliation, intimidation, abuse, or other actions of a punitive nature, such as withholding residents’ money or interfering with daily living functions such as eating, sleeping, or elimination. Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, as R1 was physically restrained by S1, which poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87468.1(a)(6)Type B

    87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (6) To leave or depart the facility at any time and to not be locked into any room, building, or on facility premises by day or night. This does not prohibit a licensee from establishing house rules, such as locking doors at night to protect residents, or barring windows against intruders, with permission from the Department. Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, as R1 was physically restrained

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the November 22, 2022 inspection of ROYAL OAKS HOME CARE?

This was a complaint inspection of ROYAL OAKS HOME CARE on November 22, 2022. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type B.

Were any citations issued to ROYAL OAKS HOME CARE on November 22, 2022?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (0 Type A, 2 Type B). The first citation was for: "87615 Prohibited Health Conditions(a) Persons who require health services for or have a health condition including, but ..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.