Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Complaint

SUNSHINE HEALTH PLACE 2License 5658019312 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Regarding the allegation: Staff are not meeting the resident's incontinence needs It was alleged that staff were double diapering Resident #1 (R1). Staff interviews confirmed that staff would place two pull-ups on R1 because of R1’s bowel and bladder incontinence. During the initial visit on 7/29/2022, the LPA was informed that R1 had on two pull-ups; at the time of observation, staff reiterated that they did so due to R1’s incontinence. At the time of observation, a home health representative was providing care to R1, and the home health representative informed staff that R1 only needed one pull-up, required frequent changing, and educated staff on the concern of skin breakdown if R1 sits in a moist pull-up for an extended period of time. An interview with a home health representative communicated that R1 was at higher risk for skin breakdown with the usage of two pull-ups and required frequent changing. Besides the observed dates of 7/29/2022, a review of home health notes indicated that R1 was observed wearing two pull ups on the following dates: 5/31/2022, 6/7/2022, 7/5/2022, and 7/21/2022. Based on the information obtained from interviews, observations, and records review, there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that staff are not meeting the resident's incontinence needs. This allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. Regarding the allegation: Staff are not changing residents bandage timely It was alleged that staff were not changing R1’s bandage on their left leg in a timely fashion. Records and interview indicated that R1 developed a blood blister on the left leg on approximately 7/7/2022. A review of home health records documented an order for the dressing on the wound to be changed every 2-3 days, or as needed, if the wound dressing becomes soiled. Records indicated that during a home health visit on 7/12/2022, R1’s bandage on the left leg was changed. Home health had educated the staff on the care for the left leg wound and communicated that the bandage would need to be changed every 2-3 days or if the bandage became soiled. Home health returned to the facility on 7/21/2022 and observed that the dressing in place on the left leg wound was dated 7/12/2022. Staff informed the home health representative that they had not changed the dressing as they assumed that the home health nurse was going to do so. As a result, the wound dressing had not been changed for nine (9) days. At the time of observation on 7/21/2022, the wound dressing was soiled. Thereafter, nursing visits from home health were increased to ensure the bandage was changed regularly. Staff interviews confirmed that at that time, home health nurses were changing the bandage on R1’s left leg wound every other day. Based on information obtained from interviews and record review, there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that staff did not change R1’s bandage timely. This allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. Regarding the allegation: Staff are not following physician’s orders It was alleged that staff were not following the physician’s orders from home health related to wound care. Records review indicated that R1 developed a stage 2 pressure injury on the buttocks on approximately 5/12/2022. Interview with home health staff revealed that it was suspected that the wound developed due to poor incontinence care, not repositioning R1 timely, and utilizing two pull-ups on R1. At that time, staff were instructed to keep R1 dry, to change R1 frequently, and to apply barrier cream. Staff interviews confirmed that they provide barrier cream to R1’s buttocks timely, ensure that R1 is repositioned, and ensure that R1 is dry. A review of home health notes indicated that R1 was observed wearing two-pull ups on 5/31/2022, 6/7/2022, 7/5/2022, and 7/21/2022. During the visit conducted on 7/29/2022, LPA observed that R1 had on two pull-ups. Staff claimed that they used two pull-ups due to R1’s incontinence, yet according to home health, wearing two pull-ups can also aid in skin breakdown. A review of home health notes regarding R1’s wound on the buttocks indicated that on the following dates, the barrier cream was observed to be applied either incorrectly or minimally: 5/31/2022, 7/25/2022, 7/27/2022, and 7/29/2022. Lastly, whereas there was an order to change R1s’ bandage on the left leg wound every 2-3 days or as needed if soiled, staff did not change R1’s between 7/12/2022 – 7/21/2022, as staff assumed that the home health nurse would change the wound dressing. Based on the information obtained from interviews and record review, there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that staff are not following physician’s orders. This allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. Pursuant to Title 22 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 9099-D). Exit interview conducted, today's report and appeal rights were reviewed and issued. Signatures were obtained.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • Right to sufficient care and qualified staff

    87468.2(a)(4) Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities. …Residents … shall have ...the following ... rights: To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, as staff failed to follow physician’s orders related to wound care for R1, which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

  • 87625(b)(1)Type A

    87625(b)(1) Managed Incontinence. …The licensee shall be responsible for the following: (1) Ensuring that residents who can benefit from scheduled toileting are assisted or reminded to go to the bathroom at regular intervals rather than being diapered. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, as R1 was double diapered due to their bladder and bowel incontinence, which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the November 1, 2022 inspection of SUNSHINE HEALTH PLACE 2?

This was a complaint inspection of SUNSHINE HEALTH PLACE 2 on November 1, 2022. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to SUNSHINE HEALTH PLACE 2 on November 1, 2022?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (2 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "87468.2(a)(4) Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities. …Residents … shall have ...the f..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.