Skip to main content

Inspection visit

Follow-up

VISTAS AT OXNARD SENIOR LIVING,THELicense 5658024252 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angel Ascencio arrived unannounced to conduct a Case Management – Other visit. The LPA met with Business Office Manger (BOM) Cynthia Garcia and explained the reason for the visit. Executive Director Kortnie Spitznogle was not able to attend. Entrance interview conducted. This visit was regarding ongoing concerns related to the current Coronavirus (COVID-19) Outbreak. Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a faxed incident report from this facility on 12/29/2022, indicating that a resident had tested positive for COVID-19 on 12/26/2022. The Department obtained a letter dated 12/30/2022 that was addressed to the residents and families of this facility, indicating that the facility had ceased communal dining and group activities due to the rising cases of COVID-19. Although the letter indicated that this plan had been discussed with the local health department and CCLD, current guidance as detailed in Provider Information Notices (PINs) and the local health department does not support the above-mentioned plan. PIN 21-49 ASC, which was released 11/17/2021, indicates that ‘Facilities may not prohibit residents from eating in the same room and/or at the same table, unless those residents are on isolation or quarantine precautions. Facilities may not prohibit residents from participating in group activities so long as there is appropriate hand hygiene, unless those residents are on isolation or quarantine precautions…. Residents who are not on isolation or quarantine precautions retain the right to participate in communal dining and group activities, regardless of their vaccination status. However, during an outbreak in the facility, the local public health department may require cessation of all communal dining and group activities until transmission has been contained.’ The investigation revealed that at this time, the local health department did not require this facility to cease communal dining and/or group activities. Per guidance from the Department, licensees must uphold the personal rights of residents by allowing residents and visitors to participate in communal dining and activities. Lastly, the investigation revealed that whereas the Administrator initially informed Ventura County Health Department (VCPH) about the initial cases of COVID-19, but no communication since the initial discussion, and VCPH was unaware of the cases of COVID-19 until they were informed by CCL. This is a repeat violation. A civil penalty of $250 is also assessed. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D): Exit interview conducted. Civil penalties assessed. A copy of the report, along with appeal rights, were provided.

Citations

3 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87211(a)(2)Type A

    87211(a)(2) Reporting Requirements. Occurrences, such as epidemic outbreaks, poisonings, catastrophes or major accidents which threaten the welfare, safety...shall be reported within 24 hours either by telephone or facsimile to the licensing agency and to the local health officer when appropriate. This requirement is not met as evidenced by:Based on interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as the facility did not report an outbreak to the appropriate agencies in a timely manner, which poses an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to persons in care.

  • 87468.2(a)(6)Type A

    87468.2(a)(6) Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities. Residents …. shall have all of the following personal rights: To make choices concerning their daily lives in the facility. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, as the facility has not allowed residents whom are not on isolation or quarantine precautions to participate in communal dining or activities, which poses an immediate personal rights risk to residents in care.

  • 87555(b)(7)Type B

    87555 General Food Service Requirements (b) (7) Modified diets prescribed by a resident's physician as a medical necessity shall be provided.This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as modified diets prescribed by resident physicians have not been followed which poses a potential health, safety and personal rights risk to resident in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 6, 2023 inspection of VISTAS AT OXNARD SENIOR LIVING,THE?

This was a other inspection of VISTAS AT OXNARD SENIOR LIVING,THE on January 6, 2023. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type A (serious).

Were any citations issued to VISTAS AT OXNARD SENIOR LIVING,THE on January 6, 2023?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (2 Type A, 0 Type B). The first citation was for: "87211(a)(2) Reporting Requirements. Occurrences, such as epidemic outbreaks, poisonings, catastrophes or major accidents..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a other inspection. other inspections are conducted by CCLD as part of their licensing oversight.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.