Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

VISTAS AT OXNARD SENIOR LIVING,THELicense 5658024252 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

(continued from LIC9099, page 1) Regarding the allegation: “Licensee does not have sufficient staff to meet the care needs of residents” LPA had investigated this same allegation under complaint control number 29-AS-20230918110909. On 3/8/2024, LPA had reviewed the staff schedule for caregivers and medication technicians. LPA went over concerns with the administrator Rick Olds, including no medication technicians on the schedule for Sundays and Thursdays during the NOC shift (10:00 p.m. - 6:15 a.m.). The administrator confirmed they have had some issues finding qualified staff to fill these time slots and on 3/7/2024, they did not have a medication technician during the NOC shift. Based on this information, this allegation is deemed Substantiated. Note: The same allegation was addressed and substantiated under complaint control number 29-AS-20230918110909 which covers the same time frame of this complaint. Regarding the allegations: “Facility staff do not ensure residents toileting needs are met in a timely manner” and “Facility staff do not ensure adequate supervision is provided to residents in care” LPAs had conducted prior investigation visits to the facility on 9/18/2023, 9/25/2023, 12/12/2023, and 3/8/2024 for complaint control number 29-AS-20230918110909. Based on interviews with staff, residents were complaining to them about long wait times to receive assistance, including toileting assistance, from staff. Staff stated due to lack of staffing, residents were not being assisted in a timely manner. Interviews with residents indicated the same issue. Based on interviews, these allegations are deemed Substantiated. Note: These allegations were encompassed under complaint control number 29-AS-20230918110909 which were addressed and substantiated; this complaint covers the same time frame. Regarding the allegation: “Staff allowed resident to leave the facility unattended”. LPA conducted interviews with staff who confirmed that resident 1 (R1) would usually wait outside in the front of the building or inside the lobby for their daughter to pick them up. On 08/21/2023, R1 was waiting in front for their daughter to take them to a dentist appointment scheduled for 3:00 p.m. The dentist is across the parking lot from the facility. Apparently, R1 decided to meet their daughter at the dentist and left the facility in their wheelchair to the dentist. R1’s daughter discovered R1 had left the facility unattended when they arrived at the facility. Although R1 had no cognitive dysfunction, R1’s physician’s report indicated R1 required assistance when leaving the facility. The facility did report this incident to CCL. Based on this information, the allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. (continued on LIC9099C, page 3) (continued from LIC9099C, page 2) Regarding the allegation: “Facility staff do not ensure reporting requirements are followed” LPA reviewed documentation regarding reported incidents involving R1. The complaint alleged R1’s incidents were not being reported to R1’s responsible party. LPA found a facility internal incident report dated 8/3/2022 involving R1 which had no indication on the report it was reported to R1’s responsible party. Based on this information, the allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. Regarding the allegation: “Facility staff was asleep while at work.” LPA conducted interviews with staff. It was confirmed that at least one staff (S1) was found asleep during the NOC shift in the common area of the memory care unit. S1 was counseled and written up. Based on this information, this allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. Regarding the allegation: “Licensee does not ensure staff are properly trained to care for residents” LPA had investigated a similar allegation under complaint control number 29-AS-20230918110909. On 3/8/2024, LPA had reviewed the staff schedule for caregivers and medication technicians. LPA went over concerns with the administrator, including no medication technicians on the schedule for Sundays and Thursdays during the NOC shift (10:00 p.m. - 6:15 a.m.). This complaint was regarding caregivers not receiving proper training for oxygen administration. The administrator Rick Olds stated all medication technicians and some caregivers receive that training. During the time of this complaint, medication technicians were not always at the facility and it was possible some caregivers may not have had training for oxygen administration. Based on this information, this allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. The following deficiencies were observed (See LIC 9099-D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report and appeal rights were provided.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87211(a)(1)Type B

    87211 Reporting Requirements (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency...: (1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence...This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, R1's responsible party was not notified of at least one incident, which posed a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.

  • 87468.1(a)(2)Type B

    87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights:(2) To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment. This was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, the licensee did not comply with the above cited section, as R1 was allowed to leave unnoticed by staff, staff was sleeping in a common area and staff require training on oxygen, which posed a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the November 5, 2024 inspection of VISTAS AT OXNARD SENIOR LIVING,THE?

This was a complaint inspection of VISTAS AT OXNARD SENIOR LIVING,THE on November 5, 2024. 2 citations were issued: 2 Type B.

Were any citations issued to VISTAS AT OXNARD SENIOR LIVING,THE on November 5, 2024?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (0 Type A, 2 Type B). The first citation was for: "87211 Reporting Requirements (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency...: (1) A written report shall be s..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.