Skip to main content

Inspection visit

complaint

VISTAS AT OXNARD SENIOR LIVING,THELicense 5658024252 citations on this visit
2 citations recorded

Inspector’s narrative

What the inspector wrote

(continued from LIC9099) it indicated S1 needed to "maintain a professional demeanor with residents and refrain from discussing unrelated care matters with them." Staff 2 (S2) and Staff 3 (S3) had witnessed S1 speak to residents in a rude manner, however S1 has improved in how they interact with residents. Resident 1 (R1) stated S1 had spoke to them rudely in the past, however S1 is very nice to them now. While S1's demeanor with residents has improved, based on interviews and record review, the allegation S1 does not treat residents with dignity is Substantiated for the time frame this complaint was reported. Regarding the allegation residents missed medications: It was reported S1 was noting on the medication administration record (MAR) the bedtime medications for memory care residents had been given, however a NOC shift medication technician witnessed the medications remained in the top drawer and were not given. Later, the medications were gone. Bedtime medications are usually given at approximately 8:00 p.m. Staff assumed the medications were destroyed since it was too late to administer the medications but there was nothing noted on the MAR about residents missing their medications. Staff stated this happened on more than one occasion and it was reported to the previous ED. Staff was not sure if anything was addressed with S1 by the prior ED. In addition, a resident complained about being given their medications late by S1 and S1 received a disciplinary write-up with that noted. While S1's performance with medications has reportedly improved, based on interviews and record review, the allegation residents missed medications is Substantiated for the time frame this complaint was reported. Regarding the allegation medications were accessible to residents in care: It was reported while S1 passed out medications cups to the assisted living residents seated in the dining room for dinner, S1 would leave the medications cups on the table rather than wait for residents to take their medications. This was confirmed during interviews with other staff. In addition, this led to one resident taking another resident's medications. Staff stated they informed the previous ED of this medication error. While S1's performance with medications has reportedly improved, based on interviews, the allegation medications were accessible to residents in care is Substantiated for the time frame this complaint was reported. The following deficiency was observed (See LIC 9099-D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Failure to correct the deficiency may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report and appeal rights were provided.

Citations

2 citations recorded*CCLD

What does Type A vs Type B mean?

Type A. Serious citation. Imminent or substantial risk to children. The regulator requires corrective action immediately and may impose a civil penalty.

Type B. Lower-severity citation. Corrective action required, no imminent risk. The regulator monitors compliance on the next visit.

  • 87465(h)(2)Type A

    87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (h) The following requirements shall apply to medications which are centrally stored:(2) Centrally stored medicines shall be kept in a safe and locked place that is not accessible to persons other than employees... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, the licensee did not comply with the above cited section, as witnesses stated S1 left medication on dining room tables unattended by staff and left meds in a drawer, which posed an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care.

  • 87468.1(a)(1)Type B

    87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (1) To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, the licensee did not comply with the above cited section, as witnesses stated S1 spoke in a rude manner to residents, which posed a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.

FAQ · About this visit

Common questions about this visit

What happened during the January 29, 2025 inspection of VISTAS AT OXNARD SENIOR LIVING,THE?

This was a complaint inspection of VISTAS AT OXNARD SENIOR LIVING,THE on January 29, 2025. 2 citations were issued: 1 Type A (serious) and 1 Type B.

Were any citations issued to VISTAS AT OXNARD SENIOR LIVING,THE on January 29, 2025?

Yes, 2 citations were issued (1 Type A, 1 Type B). The first citation was for: "87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (h) The following requirements shall apply to medications which are centrally s..."

What type of inspection was this?

This was a complaint inspection. Complaint inspections are triggered when someone reports a concern about the facility to CCLD.

SourceView on CCLDView original report

Share this reportEmail

Next steps

If this is your facility,claim this pageand correct anything the record gets wrong. Free.

Researching this visit professionally?Book a 15-minute calland we will walk through what we have on file.

Data from CCLD public records. Last updated . If you believe any information is inaccurate, report it here.